%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN009-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:31:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 9 unt; 6 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 60 ( 0 equ; 38 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 60 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ u(X1,X2,X3)
| v(X1,X2,X3)
| t(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_10) ).
cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
~ v(X1,X2,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ r(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(X3)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X1)
| r(X1,X2,X3)
| q(X1,X2,X3)
| p(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ q(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_8,negated_conjecture,
u(c,c,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_8) ).
cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
s(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ u(X1,X2,X3)
| v(X1,X2,X3)
| t(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ v(X1,X2,X3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ r(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(X3)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X1)
| r(X1,X2,X3)
| q(X1,X2,X3)
| p(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ q(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ u(X1,X2,X3)
| v(X1,X2,X3)
| t(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ v(X1,X2,X3),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ r(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(X3)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X1)
| r(X1,X2,X3)
| q(X1,X2,X3)
| p(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ q(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ u(X1,X2,X3)
| t(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
u(c,c,c),
clause_8 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ s(X3)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
t(c,c,c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
s(c),
clause_6 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN009-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:44:44 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % sh5l with pid 2912562 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.43 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2912564 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.43 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 10
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.14/0.43 % Processed clauses : 12
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.14/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.14/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20
% 0.14/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 275
% 0.14/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 20
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------