↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN011-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SYN011-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 21:43:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.46  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.50  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.50  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.14/0.50  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.50  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.14/0.50  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.14/0.50  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.14/0.50  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.14/0.50  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.50  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.50  % File     : SYN011-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.14/0.50  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.14/0.50  % Problem  : A problem to demonstrate C-reduction
% 0.14/0.50  % Version  : Biased.
% 0.14/0.50  % English  :
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  % Refs     : [Sho76] Shostak (1976), Refutation Graphs
% 0.14/0.50  % Source   : [Sho76]
% 0.14/0.50  % Names    : Problem for C Reduction [Sho76]
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.50  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.14/0.50  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   1 unt;   2 nHn;   8 RR)
% 0.14/0.50  %            Number of literals    :   17 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
% 0.14/0.50  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.14/0.50  %            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.14/0.50  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-0 aty)
% 0.14/0.50  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.14/0.50  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)
% 0.14/0.50  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_PRP
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  % Comments : Biased towards C-reduction.
% 0.14/0.50  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.14/0.50      ( ~ n
% 0.14/0.50      | ~ t ) ).
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.14/0.50      ( m
% 0.14/0.50      | q
% 0.14/0.50      | n ) ).
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.14/0.50      ( l
% 0.14/0.50      | ~ m ) ).
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.14/0.50      ( l
% 0.14/0.50      | ~ q ) ).
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.14/0.50      ( ~ l
% 0.14/0.50      | ~ p ) ).
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.14/0.50      ( r
% 0.14/0.50      | p
% 0.14/0.50      | n ) ).
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.14/0.50      ( ~ r
% 0.14/0.50      | ~ l ) ).
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(clause_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.14/0.50      t ).
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.50  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.50  % Proof found
% 0.14/0.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.50  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.50  %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.14/0.50  %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.14/0.50  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.14/0.50  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.14/0.50  %SharedTerms:15
% 0.14/0.50  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
% 0.14/0.50  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.14/0.50  [1]P1(a5000)
% 0.14/0.50  [2]P2(a5000)+~P3(a5000)
% 0.14/0.50  [3]P2(a5000)+~P4(a5000)
% 0.14/0.50  [6]~P5(a5000)+~P1(a5000)
% 0.14/0.50  [7]~P2(a5000)+~P6(a5000)
% 0.14/0.50  [8]~P2(a5000)+~P7(a5000)
% 0.14/0.50  [4]P5(a5000)+P3(a5000)+P4(a5000)
% 0.14/0.50  [5]P5(a5000)+P6(a5000)+P7(a5000)
% 0.14/0.50  %EqnAxiom
% 0.14/0.50  
% 0.14/0.50  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(9,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (~P5(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(10,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (P3(a5000)+P4(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,4])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(11,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (P6(a5000)+P7(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,5])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(13,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (~P4(a5000)+~P7(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (~P3(a5000)+~P7(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,8])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (~P3(a5000)+P6(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,11])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (P6(a5000)+P4(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[23,10])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (P4(a5000)+~P2(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,7])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (~P3(a5000)+P4(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,25])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (P4(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,10])).
% 0.14/0.50  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.14/0.50     (P2(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.50     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,3])).
% 0.14/0.51  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.14/0.51     (~P7(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.51     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,13])).
% 0.14/0.51  cnf(31,plain,
% 0.14/0.51     (~P6(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.51     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,7])).
% 0.14/0.51  cnf(33,plain,
% 0.14/0.51     (P6(a5000)),
% 0.14/0.51     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,11])).
% 0.14/0.51  cnf(36,plain,
% 0.14/0.51     ($false),
% 0.14/0.51     inference(scs_inference,[],[33,31]),
% 0.14/0.51     ['proof']).
% 0.14/0.51  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.14/0.51  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------