%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN011-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:21:55 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 7 unt; 5 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 51 ( 0 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 8 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t
| ~ n ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(clause_8,negated_conjecture,
t,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_8) ).
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q
| l ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
( n
| q
| m ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m
| l ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| ~ l ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).
cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ l
| ~ r ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).
cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
( n
| p
| r ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t
| ~ n ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ t
| ~ n ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
t,
clause_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q
| l ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( n
| q
| m ),
clause_2 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ n,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m
| l ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| ~ l ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q
| l ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( m
| q ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m
| l ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ l
| ~ r ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| ~ l ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
l,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ l
| ~ r ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( n
| p
| r ),
clause_6 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ p,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ r,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_13]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SYN011-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:39:05 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % new_bool_1 with pid 2930995 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.25/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.54 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.54 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2930997 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.54 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.54 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.54
% 0.25/0.54 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.25/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Initial clauses : 8
% 0.25/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.25/0.54 % Processed clauses : 11
% 0.25/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.25/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.25/0.54 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.25/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.25/0.54 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.25/0.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.25/0.54 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.25/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.25/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.25/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.25/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.25/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.25/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.25/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.25/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.25/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 152
% 0.25/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 12
% 0.25/0.54
% 0.25/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.54 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.54 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.25/0.54 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages
% 0.25/0.54
% 0.25/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.54 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.54 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.25/0.54 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.25/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.25/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------