↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN030-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem    : SYN030-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.25  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 18:24:23 EDT 2024
% 0.06/0.25  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.10/0.40  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.42  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.42  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.10/0.42  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.42  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.10/0.42  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.10/0.42  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.10/0.42  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.10/0.42  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.42  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.42  % File     : SYN030-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.42  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.10/0.42  % Problem  : EW3
% 0.10/0.42  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.10/0.42  % English  :
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Refs     : [MRS72] Michie et al. (1972), G-deduction
% 0.10/0.42  %          : [WM76]  Wilson & Minker (1976), Resolution, Refinements, and S
% 0.10/0.42  % Source   : [SPRFN]
% 0.10/0.42  % Names    : EW3 [MRS72]
% 0.10/0.42  %          : EW3 [WM76]
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.42  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.10/0.42  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   0 unt;   1 nHn;   9 RR)
% 0.10/0.42  %            Number of literals    :   22 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
% 0.10/0.42  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.10/0.42  %            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.10/0.42  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-0 aty)
% 0.10/0.42  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.10/0.42  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)
% 0.10/0.42  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_PRP
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Comments :
% 0.10/0.42  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(clause1,axiom,
% 0.10/0.42      ( ~ t
% 0.10/0.42      | ~ s
% 0.10/0.42      | p ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(clause2,axiom,
% 0.10/0.42      ( ~ r
% 0.10/0.42      | s ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(clause3,axiom,
% 0.10/0.42      ( ~ t
% 0.10/0.42      | r ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(clause4,axiom,
% 0.10/0.42      ( ~ r
% 0.10/0.42      | ~ q
% 0.10/0.42      | t ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(clause5,axiom,
% 0.10/0.42      ( ~ q
% 0.10/0.42      | r ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(clause6,axiom,
% 0.10/0.42      ( q
% 0.10/0.42      | r ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(clause7,axiom,
% 0.10/0.42      ( ~ r
% 0.10/0.42      | q ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(clause8,axiom,
% 0.10/0.42      ( ~ s
% 0.10/0.42      | ~ p
% 0.10/0.42      | q ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(theorem,negated_conjecture,
% 0.10/0.42      ( ~ p
% 0.10/0.42      | ~ q
% 0.10/0.42      | ~ r ) ).
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.42  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.42  % Proof found
% 0.10/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.42  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.10/0.42  %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.10/0.42  %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.10/0.42  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.10/0.42  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.10/0.42  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.10/0.42  %goalClause: 9
% 0.10/0.42  [1]P1(a5000)+P2(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  [2]P4(a5000)+~P1(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  [3]P1(a5000)+~P5(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  [4]P1(a5000)+~P2(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  [5]P2(a5000)+~P1(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  [6]P5(a5000)+~P1(a5000)+~P2(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  [7]P3(a5000)+~P5(a5000)+~P4(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  [8]P2(a5000)+~P4(a5000)+~P3(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  [9]~P3(a5000)+~P1(a5000)+~P2(a5000)
% 0.10/0.42  %EqnAxiom
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(10,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (P2(a5000)+P4(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(12,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (~P2(a5000)+P4(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,2])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(13,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (P4(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,12])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (P3(a5000)+~P5(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,7])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(15,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (P2(a5000)+~P3(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,8])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (~P5(a5000)+~P1(a5000)+~P2(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,9])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (~P3(a5000)+P1(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,4])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (~P3(a5000)+~P5(a5000)+~P2(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,17])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (~P2(a5000)+~P5(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,14])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (~P5(a5000)+~P1(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,5])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (~P2(a5000)+~P1(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,6])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (P1(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (P2(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,5])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     (~P2(a5000)),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,22])).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.10/0.42     ($false),
% 0.10/0.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[25,27]),
% 0.10/0.42     ['proof']).
% 0.10/0.42  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.10/0.42  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------