%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN032-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:31:20 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 5.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 4 unt; 9 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 56 ( 0 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 7 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(seven,hypothesis,
( ~ h
| c ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',seven) ).
cnf(one,hypothesis,
( ~ c
| ~ h ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',one) ).
cnf(prove_something,negated_conjecture,
( ~ b
| ~ a ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_something) ).
cnf(six,hypothesis,
( ~ a
| b ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',six) ).
cnf(three,hypothesis,
( ~ j
| a
| h ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',three) ).
cnf(five,hypothesis,
( ~ k
| j
| h ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',five) ).
cnf(four,hypothesis,
( j
| k
| h ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',four) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
( ~ h
| c ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[seven]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( ~ c
| ~ h ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[one]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ b
| ~ a ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_something]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( ~ a
| b ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[six]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
( ~ h
| c ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
( ~ c
| ~ h ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( ~ j
| a
| h ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[three]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ b
| ~ a ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
( ~ a
| b ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( ~ k
| j
| h ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[five]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
( j
| k
| h ),
four ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
~ h,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
( ~ j
| a
| h ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ a,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
( ~ k
| j
| h ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
( j
| k ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
( ~ j
| h ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
j,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN032-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.39 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:39:23 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3247916 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/5.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/5.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 146s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % new_bool_1 with pid 3247924 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/5.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/5.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 146s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/5.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/5.45
% 0.16/5.45 % Proof found!
% 0.16/5.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/5.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.45 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.16/5.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.16/5.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.16/5.45 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.16/5.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.16/5.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.16/5.45 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.16/5.45 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.16/5.45 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.16/5.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.16/5.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/5.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/5.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/5.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.16/5.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.16/5.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.16/5.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.16/5.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/5.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.16/5.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.16/5.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/5.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 153
% 0.16/5.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 12
% 0.16/5.45
% 0.16/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.45 % User time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/5.45 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/5.45 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages
% 0.16/5.45
% 0.16/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.45 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.16/5.45 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.16/5.45 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.16/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/5.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------