↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYN032-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:16:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.30s 2.24s
% Output   : Refutation 3.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  16   ~;  20   |;   0   &;   0   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $o ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: $o ).

thf(h_decl,type,
    h: $o ).

thf(j_decl,type,
    j: $o ).

thf(k_decl,type,
    k: $o ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: $o ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ j
    | a
    | h ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',three) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ~ j
    | a
    | h ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ k
    | j
    | h ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',five) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ~ k
    | j
    | h ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ c
    | ~ h ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',one) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ( ~ c
    | ~ h ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( j
    | k
    | h ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',four) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( j
    | k
    | h ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ h
    | c ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',seven) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ~ h
    | c ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ a
    | b ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',six) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ~ a
    | b ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ b
    | ~ a ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_something) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ~ b
    | ~ a ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,14,20,12,18,16,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN032-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.39  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:05:14 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.87/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.27/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (177ms). 
% 1.40/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.99/1.61  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.99/1.61  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.17/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 6 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.17/1.73  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 6 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.17/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.17/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.17/1.74  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.30/2.24  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.30/2.24  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.30/2.24  % Time passed: 1704ms (effective reasoning time: 1034ms)
% 3.30/2.24  % Axioms used in derivation (6): six, seven, five, one, four, three
% 3.30/2.24  % No. of inferences in proof: 15
% 3.30/2.24  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1704 ms resp. 1034 ms w/o parsing
% 3.30/2.27  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.30/2.27  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------