↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN033-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:16 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN033-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 19:27:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.42/0.61  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.60/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.60/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.60/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.60/0.64  
% 0.60/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.65  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.65  % File     : SYN033-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.60/0.65  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.60/0.65  % Problem  : DM
% 0.60/0.65  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.60/0.65  % English  :
% 0.60/0.65  
% 0.60/0.65  % Refs     : [MRS72] Michie et al. (1972), G-deduction
% 0.60/0.65  %          : [WM76]  Wilson & Minker (1976), Resolution, Refinements, and S
% 0.60/0.65  % Source   : [SPRFN]
% 0.60/0.65  % Names    : DM [MRS72]
% 0.60/0.65  %          : DM [WM76]
% 0.60/0.65  
% 0.60/0.65  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.60/0.65  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.60/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    4 (   3 unt;   0 nHn;   2 RR)
% 0.60/0.65  %            Number of literals    :    7 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
% 0.60/0.65  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.60/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.60/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.60/0.65  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.60/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)
% 0.60/0.65  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.60/0.65  
% 0.60/0.65  % Comments :
% 0.60/0.65  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.65  cnf(clause1,axiom,
% 0.60/0.65      p(g(A,B),A,B) ).
% 0.60/0.65  
% 0.60/0.65  cnf(clause2,axiom,
% 0.60/0.65      p(A,h(A,B),B) ).
% 0.60/0.65  
% 0.60/0.65  cnf(clause3,axiom,
% 0.60/0.65      ( ~ p(A,B,C)
% 0.60/0.65      | ~ p(D,E,B)
% 0.60/0.65      | ~ p(A,D,F)
% 0.60/0.65      | p(F,E,C) ) ).
% 0.60/0.65  
% 0.60/0.65  cnf(prove_something,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.65      ~ p(k(A),A,k(A)) ).
% 0.60/0.65  
% 0.60/0.65  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.60/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.60/0.65  %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.60/0.65  %VarNum:23(SingletonVarNum:11)
% 0.60/0.65  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.60/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.60/0.65  %SharedTerms:0
% 0.60/0.65  %goalClause: 3
% 0.60/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.60/0.65  [3]~P1(f3(x31),x31,f3(x31))
% 0.60/0.65  [1]P1(x11,f1(x11,x12),x12)
% 0.60/0.65  [2]P1(f2(x21,x22),x21,x22)
% 0.60/0.65  [4]~P1(x46,x45,x43)+P1(x41,x42,x43)+~P1(x44,x42,x45)+~P1(x46,x44,x41)
% 0.60/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.60/0.65  
% 0.60/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.65  cnf(5,plain,
% 0.60/0.65     ($false),
% 0.60/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,1,4]),
% 0.60/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.60/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.60/0.65  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------