↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN038-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.09  % Problem    : SYN038-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.09  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 20:15:53 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.52  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.86  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.86  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.48/0.86  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.86  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.48/0.86  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.48/0.86  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.48/0.86  
% 0.48/0.86  % Result      :Theorem 0.310000s
% 0.48/0.86  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.310000s
% 0.48/0.86  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.87  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.87  % File     : SYN038-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.48/0.87  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.48/0.87  % Problem  : Syntactic formula
% 0.48/0.87  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.48/0.87  % English  : Exists X, Exists Y, All Z (((p(X,Y) -> (p(X,Z) <-> q(Y,Z)))
% 0.48/0.87  %            & (p(X,Y) <-> (p(Z,Z) -> q(Z,Z)))) -> (q(Z,Y) <-> q(Z,Z)))
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  % Refs     : [Fri63] Friedman (1963), A Semi-Decision Procedure for the Fun
% 0.48/0.87  %          : [FL+74] Fleisig et al. (1974), An Implementation of the Model
% 0.48/0.87  %          : [WM76]  Wilson & Minker (1976), Resolution, Refinements, and S
% 0.48/0.87  % Source   : [SPRFN]
% 0.48/0.87  % Names    : Example 4 [FL+74]
% 0.48/0.87  %          : EX4-T? [WM76]
% 0.48/0.87  %          : ex4.lop [SETHEO]
% 0.48/0.87  %          : FEX4T1 [SPRFN]
% 0.48/0.87  %          : FEX4T2 [SPRFN]
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.87  % Rating   : 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.00 v2.1.0, 0.12 v2.0.0
% 0.48/0.87  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   0 unt;   2 nHn;   5 RR)
% 0.48/0.87  %            Number of literals    :   17 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
% 0.48/0.87  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.48/0.87  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.48/0.87  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.48/0.87  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.48/0.87  %            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn)
% 0.48/0.87  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  % Comments :
% 0.48/0.87  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.87  cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.87      ( ~ p(X,f(X,Y))
% 0.48/0.87      | ~ p(X,Y)
% 0.48/0.87      | q(Y,f(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.87      ( ~ p(X,Y)
% 0.48/0.87      | ~ q(Y,f(X,Y))
% 0.48/0.87      | p(X,f(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.87      ( ~ p(X,Y)
% 0.48/0.87      | ~ p(f(X,Y),f(X,Y))
% 0.48/0.87      | q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.87      ( p(X,Y)
% 0.48/0.87      | p(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.87      ( p(X,Y)
% 0.48/0.87      | ~ q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.87      ( q(X,Y)
% 0.48/0.87      | q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.87      ( ~ q(X,Y)
% 0.48/0.87      | ~ q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.87  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.87  % Proof found
% 0.48/0.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.87  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.48/0.87  %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.48/0.87  %VarNum:50(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 0.48/0.87  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.48/0.87  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.48/0.87  %SharedTerms:0
% 0.48/0.87  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
% 0.48/0.87  [1]P1(x11,x12)+P1(f1(x11,x12),f1(x11,x12))
% 0.48/0.87  [2]P2(x21,x22)+P2(f1(x21,x22),f1(x21,x22))
% 0.48/0.87  [3]P1(x31,x32)+~P2(f1(x31,x32),f1(x31,x32))
% 0.48/0.87  [6]~P2(x61,x62)+~P2(f1(x61,x62),f1(x61,x62))
% 0.48/0.87  [4]~P1(x41,x42)+P1(x41,f1(x41,x42))+~P2(x42,f1(x41,x42))
% 0.48/0.87  [5]~P1(x52,x51)+P2(x51,f1(x52,x51))+~P1(x52,f1(x52,x51))
% 0.48/0.87  [7]~P1(x71,x72)+P2(f1(x71,x72),f1(x71,x72))+~P1(f1(x71,x72),f1(x71,x72))
% 0.48/0.87  %EqnAxiom
% 0.48/0.87  
% 0.48/0.87  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.87  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P1(x171,x172)+~P1(f1(x171,x172),f1(f1(x171,x172),f1(x171,x172)))+P2(f1(x171,x172),f1(f1(x171,x172),f1(x171,x172)))),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P2(x221,x222)+P1(x221,x222)),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P2(f1(x231,x232),f1(f1(x231,x232),f1(x231,x232)))+P1(x231,x232)),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,17])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P1(x281,f1(x282,x281))+~P1(x282,x281)+P1(x282,f1(x282,x281))),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,4])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P1(f1(x291,x292),f1(f1(x291,x292),f1(x291,x292)))+P1(x291,x292)),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,1])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(31,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P2(x311,x312)+~P1(x311,f1(x311,x312))+P2(x312,f1(x311,x312))),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,5])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P2(x371,f1(x371,x372))+~P1(x371,x372)+P2(x372,f1(x371,x372))),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,5])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (~P1(x401,x402)+P2(f1(x401,x402),f1(x401,x402))),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,7])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(73,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (~P2(x731,x732)+~P1(x731,x732)),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,40])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(74,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P1(x741,x742)+~P2(f1(x741,x742),f1(f1(x741,x742),f1(x741,x742)))),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[73,29])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(75,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P1(x751,x752)),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,23])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(79,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P1(x791,x792)),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(rename_variables,[],[75])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(82,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     (P1(x821,x822)),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(rename_variables,[],[75])).
% 0.48/0.88  cnf(84,plain,
% 0.48/0.88     ($false),
% 0.48/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[75,79,82,73,5,31,37]),
% 0.48/0.88     ['proof']).
% 0.48/0.88  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.48/0.88  % Total time :0.310000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------