↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN040+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem    : SYN040+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 19:32:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.57/0.63  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.66  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.60/0.66  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.66  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.60/0.66  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.60/0.66  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.60/0.66  
% 0.60/0.66  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.66  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  % File     : SYN040+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.60/0.67  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.60/0.67  % Problem  : Pelletier Problem 1
% 0.60/0.67  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.60/0.67  % English  : A biconditional version of the 'most difficult' theorem
% 0.60/0.67  %            proved by the original Logic Theorist.
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  % Refs     : [NSS63] Newell et al. (1963), Empirical Explorations with the
% 0.60/0.67  %          : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.60/0.67  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.60/0.67  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.60/0.67  % Names    : Pelletier 1 [Pel86]
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.60/0.67  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.60/0.67  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   0 equ)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of connectives :    5 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
% 0.60/0.67  %                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-0 aty)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)
% 0.60/0.67  % SPC      : FOF_THM_PRP
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  % Comments : [NSS63] first appeared in 1957, as cited in [Pel86]. The 1963
% 0.60/0.67  %            version is a reprint.
% 0.60/0.67  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  fof(pel1,conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( ( p
% 0.60/0.67       => q )
% 0.60/0.67    <=> ( ~ q
% 0.60/0.67       => ~ p ) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  % Proof found
% 0.60/0.67  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.67  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.60/0.67  %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.60/0.67  %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.60/0.67  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.60/0.67  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.60/0.67  %SharedTerms:5
% 0.60/0.67  %goalClause: 1 2 5
% 0.60/0.67  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.60/0.67  [1]P1(a5000)
% 0.60/0.67  [2]~P2(a5000)
% 0.60/0.67  [5]P2(a5000)+~P1(a5000)
% 0.60/0.67  %EqnAxiom
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(6,plain,
% 0.60/0.67     ($false),
% 0.60/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,5]),
% 0.60/0.67     ['proof']).
% 0.60/0.67  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.60/0.67  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------