↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYN045^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:41:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.49s 3.05s
% Output   : Refutation 7.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN045^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:20:20 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.87/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.22/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (227ms). 
% 1.22/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.22/1.44  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.22/1.45  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.44/1.58  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.63/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.63/1.63  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.63/1.63  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.63/1.64  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 7.49/3.04  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 7.49/3.04  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 7.49/3.05  % Time passed: 2708ms (effective reasoning time: 2012ms)
% 7.49/3.05  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 7.49/3.05  % Axioms used in derivation (2): refl_axiom, trans_axiom
% 7.49/3.05  % No. of inferences in proof: 8
% 7.49/3.05  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2708 ms resp. 2012 ms w/o parsing
% 7.49/3.07  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.49/3.07  thf(irel_decl, type, irel: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mand_decl, type, mand: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mimplies_decl, type, mimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mbox_s4_decl, type, mbox_s4: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(iatom_decl, type, iatom: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(iand_decl, type, iand: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(ior_decl, type, ior: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(iimplies_decl, type, iimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(iequiv_decl, type, iequiv: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(ivalid_decl, type, ivalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(p_decl, type, p: ($i > $o)).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(q_decl, type, q: ($i > $o)).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(r_decl, type, r: ($i > $o)).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mand_def, definition, mand = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) & (B @ C))) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mimplies_def, definition, mimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(mbox_s4_def, definition, mbox_s4 = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (A @ C))) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(iatom_def, definition, iatom = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (A)) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(iand_def, definition, iand = (mand) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(ior_def, definition, ior = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mbox_s4 @ A) @ (mbox_s4 @ B))) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(iimplies_def, definition, iimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mimplies @ (mbox_s4 @ A) @ (mbox_s4 @ B))) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(iequiv_def, definition, iequiv = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (iand @ (iimplies @ A @ B) @ (iimplies @ B @ A))) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(ivalid_def, definition, ivalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(1,conjecture,((ivalid @ (iequiv @ (ior @ (iatom @ p) @ (iand @ (iatom @ q) @ (iatom @ r))) @ (iand @ (ior @ (iatom @ p) @ (iatom @ q)) @ (ior @ (iatom @ p) @ (iatom @ r)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel13)).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (ivalid @ (iequiv @ (ior @ (iatom @ p) @ (iand @ (iatom @ q) @ (iatom @ r))) @ (iand @ (ior @ (iatom @ p) @ (iatom @ q)) @ (ior @ (iatom @ p) @ (iatom @ r))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(5,plain,((~ (! [A:$i]: ((~ (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p @ C)) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => ((q @ C) & (r @ C)))))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => ((! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p @ C)) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (q @ C))) & (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p @ C)) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (r @ C)))))) & (~ (! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => ((! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p @ C)) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (q @ C))) & (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p @ C)) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (r @ C)))))) | ! [B:$i]: ((irel @ A @ B) => (! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => (p @ C)) | ! [C:$i]: ((irel @ B @ C) => ((q @ C) & (r @ C)))))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(3,axiom,((! [A:$i]: (irel @ A @ A))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',refl_axiom)).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(28,plain,((! [A:$i]: (irel @ A @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(4,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((irel @ A @ B) & (irel @ B @ C)) => (irel @ A @ C)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trans_axiom)).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(30,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((irel @ A @ B) & (irel @ B @ C)) => (irel @ A @ C)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 7.49/3.07  thf(906,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[5,28,30])).
% 7.49/3.07  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.49/3.07  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------