%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN047-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:20 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN047-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 00:09:09 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.53/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.54/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % File : SYN047-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.54/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.54/0.61 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 17 % 0.54/0.61 % Version : Especial. % 0.54/0.61 % English : A problem which appears to not be provable by [BBH72]. % 0.54/0.61 % For details of why not, see [Pel82] p.135f. % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Refs : Bledsoe W., Boyer R., Nenneman W. (1972), Computer Proofs of % 0.54/0.61 % : [Pel82] Pelletier (1982), Completely Non-clausal, Completely H % 0.54/0.61 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au % 0.54/0.61 % Source : [Pel86] % 0.54/0.61 % Names : Pelletier 17 [Pel86] % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0 % 0.54/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 2 unt; 1 nHn; 5 RR) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 5 neg) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 prp; 0-0 aty) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn) % 0.54/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_PRP % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Comments : % 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 p ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 ( ~ p % 0.54/0.61 | q % 0.54/0.61 | s ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 ( ~ p % 0.54/0.61 | ~ r % 0.54/0.61 | s ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 ~ s ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 ( ~ q % 0.54/0.61 | r ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % Proof found % 0.54/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.61 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.54/0.61 %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0) % 0.54/0.61 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.54/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.54/0.61 %SharedTerms:9 % 0.54/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 % 0.54/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.54/0.61 [1]P1(a5000) % 0.54/0.61 [2]~P2(a5000) % 0.54/0.61 [3]P3(a5000)+~P4(a5000) % 0.54/0.61 [4]P4(a5000)+P2(a5000)+~P1(a5000) % 0.54/0.61 [5]P2(a5000)+~P1(a5000)+~P3(a5000) % 0.54/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 cnf(8,plain, % 0.54/0.62 ($false), % 0.54/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,3,4]), % 0.54/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.54/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.54/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------