%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN052-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:22:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.27s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 3 unt; 2 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| big_f(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(a)
| ~ p ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
( p
| big_f(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1)
| p ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| big_f(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(a)
| ~ p ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| big_f(X1) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p
| big_f(X1) ),
clause_3 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1)
| p ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(a)
| ~ p ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
big_f(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1)
| p ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10])]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN052-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:40:34 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.53 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2933797 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.27/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.53 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.53 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2933801 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.27/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.53 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.53 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.27/0.53
% 0.27/0.53 % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.27/0.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.53 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.27/0.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.27/0.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.27/0.53 % Processed clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.27/0.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.27/0.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.27/0.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 102
% 0.27/0.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.27/0.53
% 0.27/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.53 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/0.53 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.27/0.53
% 0.27/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.53 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.27/0.53 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------