↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN054+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN054+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Jun 24 00:16:24 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.48/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.48/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.48/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.48/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.48/0.60  
% 0.48/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.48/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.48/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.60  % File     : SYN054+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.48/0.60  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.48/0.60  % Problem  : Pelletier Problem 24
% 0.48/0.60  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.48/0.60  % English  :
% 0.48/0.60  
% 0.48/0.60  % Refs     : [KM64]  Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.48/0.60  %          : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.48/0.60  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.48/0.60  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.48/0.60  % Names    : Pelletier 24 [Pel86]
% 0.48/0.60  
% 0.48/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.48/0.60  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.48/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.48/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :   12 (   0 equ)
% 0.48/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.48/0.60  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   2   ~;   2   |;   2   &)
% 0.48/0.60  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.48/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.48/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.48/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.48/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.48/0.60  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   2   !;   4   ?)
% 0.48/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.48/0.60  
% 0.48/0.60  % Comments :
% 0.48/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.60  fof(pel24_1,axiom,
% 0.48/0.60      ~ ? [X] :
% 0.48/0.60          ( big_s(X)
% 0.48/0.60          & big_q(X) ) ).
% 0.48/0.60  
% 0.48/0.60  fof(pel24_2,axiom,
% 0.48/0.60      ! [X] :
% 0.48/0.60        ( big_p(X)
% 0.48/0.60       => ( big_q(X)
% 0.48/0.60          | big_r(X) ) ) ).
% 0.48/0.60  
% 0.48/0.61  fof(pel24_3,axiom,
% 0.48/0.61      ( ~ ? [X] : big_p(X)
% 0.48/0.61     => ? [Y] : big_q(Y) ) ).
% 0.48/0.61  
% 0.48/0.61  fof(pel24_4,axiom,
% 0.48/0.61      ! [X] :
% 0.48/0.61        ( ( big_q(X)
% 0.48/0.61          | big_r(X) )
% 0.48/0.61       => big_s(X) ) ).
% 0.48/0.61  
% 0.48/0.61  fof(pel24,conjecture,
% 0.48/0.61      ? [X] :
% 0.48/0.61        ( big_p(X)
% 0.48/0.61        & big_r(X) ) ).
% 0.48/0.61  
% 0.48/0.61  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.48/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.48/0.61  %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.48/0.61  %VarNum:11(SingletonVarNum:5)
% 0.48/0.61  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.48/0.61  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.48/0.61  %SharedTerms:4
% 0.48/0.61  %goalClause: 5
% 0.48/0.61  [1]P1(a1)+P2(a2)
% 0.48/0.61  [2]~P1(x21)+P3(x21)
% 0.48/0.61  [3]~P4(x31)+P3(x31)
% 0.48/0.61  [4]~P1(x41)+~P3(x41)
% 0.48/0.61  [5]~P4(x51)+~P2(x51)
% 0.48/0.61  [6]P4(x61)+~P2(x61)+P1(x61)
% 0.48/0.61  %EqnAxiom
% 0.48/0.61  
% 0.48/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(7,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (P3(a1)+P2(a2)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(8,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (~P4(x81)+~P1(x81)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(9,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (~P4(a2)+P3(a1)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,7])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(10,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (~P4(a1)+P2(a2)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,1])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(11,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (~P2(a2)+P1(a2)+P3(a1)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,6])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(12,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (~P4(a2)+~P4(a1)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,5])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(13,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (~P2(a2)+P1(a2)+~P4(a1)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,6])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (P1(a2)+P3(a1)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,7])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(15,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (P3(a2)+P3(a1)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,2])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(16,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (~P1(a2)+P3(a1)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,4])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (P3(a1)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,14])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (P2(a2)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,4,1])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     (~P4(a2)),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,4,1,13,5])).
% 0.48/0.61  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.48/0.61     ($false),
% 0.48/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,20,6,2,4]),
% 0.48/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.48/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.48/0.61  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------