%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN055-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:22 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN055-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 00:04:39 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.49/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.54/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 % File : SYN055-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.54/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.54/0.60 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 25 % 0.54/0.60 % Version : Especial. % 0.54/0.60 % English : % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal % 0.54/0.60 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au % 0.54/0.60 % Source : [Pel86] % 0.54/0.60 % Names : Pelletier 25 [Pel86] % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0 % 0.54/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 1 unt; 2 nHn; 7 RR) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 9 neg) % 0.54/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg) % 0.54/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.54/0.60 % Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn) % 0.54/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 % Comments : % 0.54/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 cnf(clause_1,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 big_p(a) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(clause_2,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 ( ~ big_f(X) % 0.54/0.60 | ~ big_g(X) % 0.54/0.60 | ~ big_r(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(clause_3,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 ( ~ big_p(X) % 0.54/0.60 | big_f(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(clause_4,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 ( ~ big_p(X) % 0.54/0.60 | big_g(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(clause_5,axiom, % 0.54/0.60 ( ~ big_p(X) % 0.54/0.60 | big_q(X) % 0.54/0.60 | big_p(b) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.60 ( ~ big_p(X) % 0.54/0.60 | big_q(X) % 0.54/0.60 | big_r(b) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.60 ( ~ big_q(X) % 0.54/0.60 | ~ big_p(X) ) ). % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 % Proof found % 0.54/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.60 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.54/0.60 %VarNum:13(SingletonVarNum:6) % 0.54/0.60 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.54/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.54/0.60 %SharedTerms:5 % 0.54/0.60 %goalClause: 4 6 % 0.54/0.60 [1]P1(a1) % 0.54/0.60 [2]~P1(x21)+P2(x21) % 0.54/0.60 [3]~P1(x31)+P3(x31) % 0.54/0.60 [4]~P4(x41)+~P1(x41) % 0.54/0.60 [5]~P1(x51)+P4(x51)+P1(a2) % 0.54/0.60 [6]~P1(x61)+P4(x61)+P5(a2) % 0.54/0.60 [7]~P3(x71)+~P5(x71)+~P2(x71) % 0.54/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 cnf(12,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (P1(a2)), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,4])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(15,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (P5(a2)), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,6,4])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(18,plain, % 0.54/0.61 (~P3(a2)), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,7,2])). % 0.54/0.61 cnf(20,plain, % 0.54/0.61 ($false), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,18,3]), % 0.54/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.54/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.54/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------