%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN056-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:32:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_24ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_34ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ big_s(X2)
| ~ big_q(X2)
| ~ big_p(X1)
| big_r(X1) ),
c_0_14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
big_q(a),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ big_r(X1)
| ~ big_q(X2)
| ~ big_p(X1)
| big_s(X2) ),
c_0_24,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ big_p(X1)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| big_r(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ big_p(X2)
| ~ big_q(X2)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| big_s(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
big_q(d),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
big_p(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_r(c)
| ~ big_p(X1)
| big_r(X1) ),
c_0_37,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_s(d)
| ~ big_r(c) ),
c_0_44,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
big_p(c),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_35])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_s(d)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| big_s(X1) ),
c_0_56,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(d),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_38]),c_0_35])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_42]),c_0_35])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
~ big_q(c),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]),c_0_35])]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN056-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:42:19 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2715310 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 2715320 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.15/0.43 % Processed clauses : 63
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...subsumed : 5
% 0.15/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 58
% 0.15/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 21
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.15/0.43 % Generated clauses : 62
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 54
% 0.15/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 0.15/0.43 % Paramodulations : 62
% 0.15/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 23
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of those cached : 19
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 44
% 0.15/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 69
% 0.15/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 0.15/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.15/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1139
% 0.15/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 30
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------