%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN058-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:46:58 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.27s
% Output : Proof 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN058-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.18 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:22:36 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.19 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.27 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.07/0.27
% 0.07/0.27 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.27
% 0.07/0.27 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.07/0.27 Axiom 1 (clause_7): big_p(d) = true.
% 0.07/0.27 Axiom 2 (clause_8): big_f(d) = true.
% 0.07/0.27 Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.07/0.27 Axiom 4 (clause_3): ifeq(big_q(b), true, big_s(c), true) = true.
% 0.07/0.27 Axiom 5 (clause_1): ifeq(big_p(X), true, big_q(Y), true) = true.
% 0.07/0.27 Axiom 6 (clause_6): ifeq(big_f(X), true, ifeq(big_s(Y), true, big_g(X), true), true) = true.
% 0.07/0.27
% 0.07/0.27 Goal 1 (clause_9): big_g(d) = true.
% 0.07/0.27 Proof:
% 0.07/0.27 big_g(d)
% 0.07/0.27 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.07/0.27 ifeq(true, true, big_g(d), true)
% 0.22/0.27 = { by axiom 4 (clause_3) R->L }
% 0.22/0.27 ifeq(ifeq(big_q(b), true, big_s(c), true), true, big_g(d), true)
% 0.22/0.27 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.22/0.27 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, big_q(b), true), true, big_s(c), true), true, big_g(d), true)
% 0.22/0.27 = { by axiom 1 (clause_7) R->L }
% 0.22/0.27 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(big_p(d), true, big_q(b), true), true, big_s(c), true), true, big_g(d), true)
% 0.22/0.27 = { by axiom 5 (clause_1) }
% 0.22/0.27 ifeq(ifeq(true, true, big_s(c), true), true, big_g(d), true)
% 0.22/0.27 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.22/0.27 ifeq(big_s(c), true, big_g(d), true)
% 0.22/0.27 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.22/0.27 ifeq(true, true, ifeq(big_s(c), true, big_g(d), true), true)
% 0.22/0.27 = { by axiom 2 (clause_8) R->L }
% 0.22/0.27 ifeq(big_f(d), true, ifeq(big_s(c), true, big_g(d), true), true)
% 0.22/0.27 = { by axiom 6 (clause_6) }
% 0.22/0.27 true
% 0.22/0.27 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.27
% 0.22/0.27 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------