↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN063+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.16s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (   7 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  197 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  241 (  88   ~; 102   |;  40   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   3 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn  22   !;   4   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ( ( big_p(X0)
           => big_p(b) )
          & big_p(a) )
       => big_p(c) )
  <=> ! [X1] :
        ( ( big_p(c)
          | ~ big_p(b)
          | ~ big_p(a) )
        & ( big_p(c)
          | big_p(X1)
          | ~ big_p(a) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel33) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0] :
          ( ( ( big_p(X0)
             => big_p(b) )
            & big_p(a) )
         => big_p(c) )
    <=> ! [X1] :
          ( ( big_p(c)
            | ~ big_p(b)
            | ~ big_p(a) )
          & ( big_p(c)
            | big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(a) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ( big_p(X0)
          & ~ big_p(b) )
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(c) )
  <~> ! [X1] :
        ( ( big_p(c)
          | ~ big_p(b)
          | ~ big_p(a) )
        & ( big_p(c)
          | big_p(X1)
          | ~ big_p(a) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ( big_p(X0)
          & ~ big_p(b) )
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(c) )
  <~> ! [X1] :
        ( ( big_p(c)
          | ~ big_p(b)
          | ~ big_p(a) )
        & ( big_p(c)
          | big_p(X1)
          | ~ big_p(a) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ( ~ sP1
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ( big_p(X0)
            & ~ big_p(b) )
          | ~ big_p(a)
          | big_p(c) ) )
    & ( ? [X0] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(X0)
            | big_p(b) )
          & big_p(a)
          & ~ big_p(c) )
      | sP1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ( ~ sP1
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ( big_p(X1)
            & ~ big_p(b) )
          | ~ big_p(a)
          | big_p(c) ) )
    & ( ? [X0] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(X0)
            | big_p(b) )
          & big_p(a)
          & ~ big_p(c) )
      | sP1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ( ~ sP1
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ( big_p(X1)
            & ~ big_p(b) )
          | ~ big_p(a)
          | big_p(c) ) )
    & ( ( ( ~ big_p(sK2)
          | big_p(b) )
        & big_p(a)
        & ~ big_p(c) )
      | sP1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK2)],[f9]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ( sP1
      | ! [X1] :
          ( sP0
          & ( big_p(c)
            | big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(a) ) ) )
    & ( ~ sP1
      | ? [X1] :
          ( ~ sP0
          | ( ~ big_p(c)
            & ~ big_p(X1)
            & big_p(a) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( ( sP1
      | ! [X1] :
          ( sP0
          & ( big_p(c)
            | big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(a) ) ) )
    & ( ~ sP1
      | ? [X0] :
          ( ~ sP0
          | ( ~ big_p(c)
            & ~ big_p(X0)
            & big_p(a) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ( sP1
      | ! [X1] :
          ( sP0
          & ( big_p(c)
            | big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(a) ) ) )
    & ( ~ sP1
      | ~ sP0
      | ( ~ big_p(c)
        & ~ big_p(sK3)
        & big_p(a) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK3)],[f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ sP1
      | big_p(X1)
      | ~ big_p(a)
      | big_p(c) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( ~ sP1
    | ~ big_p(b)
    | ~ big_p(a)
    | big_p(c) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( big_p(a)
    | sP1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(c)
    | sP1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( sP1
    | sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( sP1
      | big_p(c)
      | big_p(X1)
      | ~ big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( ~ sP1
    | ~ sP0
    | ~ big_p(c) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ~ sP1
    | ~ sP0
    | big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ( sP1
    | ~ big_p(c) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ( sP1
    | big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ( big_p(c)
    | ~ sP1
    | ~ big_p(b)
    | ~ big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( big_p(c)
      | big_p(X0)
      | ~ sP1
      | ~ big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(a)
    | ~ sP0
    | ~ sP1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sP0
    | ~ sP1
    | ~ big_p(c) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sP1
      | big_p(c)
      | big_p(X0)
      | ~ big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0
    | sP1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f5,definition,
    ( sP0
  <=> ( big_p(c)
      | ~ big_p(b)
      | ~ big_p(a) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP0])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).

fof(f6,definition,
    ( sP1
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( ( big_p(X0)
          & ~ big_p(b) )
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(c) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( sP1
  <~> ! [X1] :
        ( sP0
        & ( big_p(c)
          | big_p(X1)
          | ~ big_p(a) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f4,f6,f5]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( ( ~ sP0
      | big_p(c)
      | ~ big_p(b)
      | ~ big_p(a) )
    & ( ( ~ big_p(c)
        & big_p(b)
        & big_p(a) )
      | sP0 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( ( ~ sP0
      | big_p(c)
      | ~ big_p(b)
      | ~ big_p(a) )
    & ( ( ~ big_p(c)
        & big_p(b)
        & big_p(a) )
      | sP0 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(c)
    | sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( big_p(b)
    | sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( big_p(a)
    | sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ( sP0
    | big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ( sP0
    | big_p(b) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ( sP0
    | ~ big_p(c) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    sP0,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_62,c_55,c_54,c_56,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    big_p(a),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_62,c_55,c_54,c_50,c_56,c_58,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ~ big_p(c),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_49,c_60,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_p(c),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_73]) ).

tcf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : big_p(X0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_62,c_55,c_54,c_56,c_49,c_60,c_61,c_53,c_52,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : big_p(X0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_83]) ).

tcf(c_95,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_85]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN063+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:01:02 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.16/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.16/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.16/1.28  
% 1.16/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.16/1.28  
% 1.16/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.16/1.28  
% 1.16/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.16/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.16/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.16/1.28  
% 1.16/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.16/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_non_horn_non_eq
% 1.16/1.28  % 
% 1.16/1.28  
% 1.16/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 1.16/1.28  
% 1.16/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.16/1.28  
% 1.16/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.16/1.28  
% 1.16/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------