%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN063-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:22:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 5.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 8 unt; 7 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(b)
| ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(c) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(X2)
| big_p(c)
| big_p(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(d)
| ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(b)
| big_p(c)
| big_p(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
big_p(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(b)
| ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(c) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(c),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(X2)
| big_p(c)
| big_p(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(d)
| ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(b)
| big_p(c)
| big_p(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(b)
| ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(c) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
big_p(a),
clause_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(c),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(X2)
| big_p(c)
| big_p(X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(d)
| ~ big_p(a)
| big_p(b)
| big_p(c)
| big_p(X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(b),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(X2)
| big_p(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10])]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
big_p(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN063-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:42:01 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 688966 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/5.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.43 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % new_bool_1 with pid 688974 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.43 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/5.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.43 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/5.43 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/5.43
% 0.15/5.43 % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/5.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.44 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.15/5.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.15/5.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.15/5.44 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.15/5.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.15/5.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.15/5.44 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.15/5.44 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.15/5.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.15/5.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.15/5.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 256
% 0.15/5.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 16
% 0.15/5.44
% 0.15/5.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.44 % User time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/5.44 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/5.44 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/5.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.15/5.44
% 0.15/5.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.44 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/5.44 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/5.44 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/5.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/5.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------