%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN068+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:27 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN068+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 21:56:08 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.48/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.53/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.53/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.53/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.53/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.53/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 % File : SYN068+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.53/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.53/0.60 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 44 % 0.53/0.60 % Version : Especial. % 0.53/0.60 % English : % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal % 0.53/0.60 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au % 0.53/0.60 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.53/0.60 % Source : [Hah94] % 0.53/0.60 % Names : Pelletier 44 [Pel86] % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Status : Theorem % 0.53/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.22 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 0.53/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ) % 0.53/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 3 avg) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of connectives : 9 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 5 &) % 0.53/0.60 % ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.53/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg) % 0.53/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of variables : 6 ( 2 !; 4 ?) % 0.53/0.60 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Comments : % 0.53/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 fof(pel44_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ! [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( big_f(X) % 0.53/0.60 => ( ? [Y] : % 0.53/0.60 ( big_g(Y) % 0.53/0.60 & big_h(X,Y) ) % 0.53/0.60 & ? [Y1] : % 0.53/0.60 ( big_g(Y1) % 0.53/0.60 & ~ big_h(X,Y1) ) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(pel44_2,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ? [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( big_j(X) % 0.53/0.60 & ! [Y] : % 0.53/0.60 ( big_g(Y) % 0.53/0.60 => big_h(X,Y) ) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 fof(pel44,conjecture, % 0.53/0.60 ? [X] : % 0.53/0.60 ( big_j(X) % 0.53/0.60 & ~ big_f(X) ) ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 % Proof found % 0.53/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.53/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.53/0.60 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.53/0.60 %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:6) % 0.53/0.60 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.53/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.53/0.60 %SharedTerms:2 % 0.53/0.60 %goalClause: 2 % 0.53/0.60 [1]P1(a1) % 0.53/0.60 [2]~P1(x21)+P2(x21) % 0.53/0.60 [5]~P3(x51)+P4(a1,x51) % 0.53/0.60 [3]~P2(x31)+P3(f2(x31)) % 0.53/0.60 [4]~P2(x41)+P3(f3(x41)) % 0.53/0.60 [6]~P2(x61)+P4(x61,f2(x61)) % 0.53/0.60 [7]~P2(x71)+~P4(x71,f3(x71)) % 0.53/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.61 cnf(9,plain, % 0.53/0.61 (P3(f3(a1))), % 0.53/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,2])). % 0.53/0.61 cnf(11,plain, % 0.53/0.61 (~P4(a1,f3(a1))), % 0.53/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7,2])). % 0.53/0.61 cnf(12,plain, % 0.53/0.61 ($false), % 0.53/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,11,5]), % 0.53/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.53/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.53/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------