%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN068-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:01 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_j(X1)
| big_f(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).
cnf(clause_4,axiom,
( ~ big_h(X1,g(X1))
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(clause_6,axiom,
( ~ big_g(X1)
| big_h(a,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).
cnf(clause_5,axiom,
big_j(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).
cnf(clause_3,axiom,
( ~ big_f(X1)
| big_g(g(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_j(X1)
| big_f(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ big_h(X1,g(X1))
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ big_g(X1)
| big_h(a,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_j(X1)
| big_f(X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
big_j(a),
clause_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ big_h(X1,g(X1))
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ big_g(X1)
| big_h(a,X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
big_f(a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ big_f(X1)
| big_g(g(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
~ big_g(g(a)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ big_f(X1)
| big_g(g(X1)) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN068-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.58 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.58 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.58 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.58 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.58 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.58 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:41:37 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.58 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.63 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.63 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.64 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % new_bool_3 with pid 2936179 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.64 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.64 % Search class: FHHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.64 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2936185 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.64 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.64 % Search class: FHHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.64 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.64 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.64
% 0.14/0.64 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.64 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.64 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.64 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.14/0.64 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.14/0.64 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.14/0.64 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.14/0.64 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.14/0.64 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.14/0.64 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.14/0.64 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.14/0.64 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.14/0.64 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.64 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.64 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.64 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.64 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.64 % Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.14/0.64 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.64 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.64 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.14/0.64 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.64 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.64 % Termbank termtop insertions : 190
% 0.14/0.64 % Search garbage collected termcells : 13
% 0.14/0.64
% 0.14/0.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.64 % User time : 0.000 s
% 0.14/0.64 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.64 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.64 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.14/0.64
% 0.14/0.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.64 % User time : 0.000 s
% 0.14/0.64 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.64 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.64 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------