↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN068-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.edVYoZP2Sj true

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:03:56 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.37s 2.88s
% Output   : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/1.15  % Problem  : SYN068-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/1.25  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.edVYoZP2Sj true
% 0.14/1.66  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/1.66  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/1.66  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/1.66  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/1.66  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/1.66  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/1.66  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/1.66  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:45:54 EDT 2025
% 0.14/1.68  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/1.68  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/1.68  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/1.70  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/1.71  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/1.73  % Running in FO mode
% 0.50/2.40  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.50/2.40  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.50/2.40  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.50/2.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/2.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.32/2.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.32/2.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.32/2.84  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.37/2.86  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.37/2.86  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.37/2.88  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.37/2.88  % BCE start: 7
% 1.37/2.88  % BCE eliminated: 1
% 1.37/2.88  % PE start: 6
% 1.37/2.88  logic: neq
% 1.37/2.88  % PE eliminated: 4
% 1.37/2.88  % done 1 iterations in 0.022s
% 1.37/2.88  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.37/2.88  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/2.88  thf(big_h_type, type, big_h: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(big_f_type, type, big_f: $i > $o).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(g_type, type, g: $i > $i).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(big_g_type, type, big_g: $i > $o).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(big_j_type, type, big_j: $i > $o).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(clause_3, axiom, (( ~( big_f @ X ) ) | ( big_g @ ( g @ X ) ))).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.37/2.88      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (big_f @ X0) |  (big_g @ (g @ X0)))),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_3])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(clause_6, axiom, (( ~( big_g @ X ) ) | ( big_h @ a @ X ))).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.37/2.88      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (big_g @ X0) |  (big_h @ a @ X0))),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_6])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(clause_4, axiom, (( ~( big_f @ X ) ) | ( ~( big_h @ X @ ( g @ X ) ) ))).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.37/2.88      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (big_f @ X0) | ~ (big_h @ X0 @ (g @ X0)))),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_4])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, ((~ (big_g @ (g @ a)) | ~ (big_f @ a))),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.37/2.88                [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, ((~ (big_f @ a) | ~ (big_f @ a))),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.37/2.88                [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, (~ (big_f @ a)),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(clause_5, axiom, (big_j @ a)).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ( (big_j @ a)),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_5])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(clause_7, conjecture, (~( ( big_f @ X ) | ( ~( big_j @ X ) ) ))).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( big_f @ X ) | ( ~( big_j @ X ) )),
% 1.37/2.88    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause_7])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (big_f @ X0) | ~ (big_j @ X0))),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, ( (big_f @ a)),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.37/2.88                [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 1.37/2.88  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, ($false),
% 1.37/2.88      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 1.37/2.88  
% 1.37/2.88  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.37/2.88  
% 1.37/2.88  
% 1.37/2.88  % Terminating...
% 1.63/3.21  % Runner terminated.
% 1.63/3.24  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------