↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN070-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:27 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SYN070-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 18:59:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.58/0.63  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.72  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.59/0.72  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.72  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.59/0.72  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.59/0.72  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.59/0.72  
% 0.59/0.72  % Result      :Theorem 0.040000s
% 0.59/0.72  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.040000s
% 0.59/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.73  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.73  % File     : SYN070-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.59/0.73  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.59/0.73  % Problem  : Pelletier Problem 46
% 0.59/0.73  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.59/0.73  % English  :
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  % Refs     : [KM64]  Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.59/0.73  %          : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.59/0.73  % Source   : [Pel86]
% 0.59/0.73  % Names    : Pelletier 46 [Pel86]
% 0.59/0.73  %          : p46.in [ANL]
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.59/0.73  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.59/0.73  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   2 unt;   4 nHn;   9 RR)
% 0.59/0.73  %            Number of literals    :   26 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
% 0.59/0.73  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.59/0.73  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.59/0.73  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.59/0.73  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.59/0.73  %            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)
% 0.59/0.73  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  % Comments :
% 0.59/0.73  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_1,axiom,
% 0.59/0.73      ( ~ big_f(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_f(f(X))
% 0.59/0.73      | big_g(X) ) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_2,axiom,
% 0.59/0.73      ( ~ big_f(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_h(f(X),X)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_g(X) ) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_3,axiom,
% 0.59/0.73      ( ~ big_f(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | ~ big_g(f(X))
% 0.59/0.73      | big_g(X) ) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_4,axiom,
% 0.59/0.73      ( ~ big_f(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_g(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_f(a) ) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_5,axiom,
% 0.59/0.73      ( ~ big_f(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_g(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | ~ big_g(a) ) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_6,axiom,
% 0.59/0.73      ( ~ big_f(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_g(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | ~ big_f(Y)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_g(Y)
% 0.59/0.73      | big_j(a,Y) ) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_7,axiom,
% 0.59/0.73      ( ~ big_f(X)
% 0.59/0.73      | ~ big_f(Y)
% 0.59/0.73      | ~ big_h(X,Y)
% 0.59/0.73      | ~ big_j(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.59/0.73      big_f(b) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(clause_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.59/0.73      ~ big_g(b) ).
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.73  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.73  % Proof found
% 0.59/0.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.73  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.59/0.73  %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.59/0.73  %VarNum:25(SingletonVarNum:9)
% 0.59/0.73  %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.59/0.73  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.59/0.73  %SharedTerms:6
% 0.59/0.73  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.59/0.73  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.59/0.73  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.59/0.73  [2]~P2(a1)
% 0.59/0.73  [3]~P1(x31)+P2(x31)+P1(a2)
% 0.59/0.73  [4]~P1(x41)+P2(x41)+~P2(a2)
% 0.59/0.73  [5]~P1(x51)+P2(x51)+P1(f3(x51))
% 0.59/0.73  [6]~P1(x61)+P2(x61)+~P2(f3(x61))
% 0.59/0.73  [7]~P1(x71)+P2(x71)+P3(f3(x71),x71)
% 0.59/0.73  [9]~P3(x92,x91)+~P4(x91,x92)+~P1(x91)+~P1(x92)
% 0.59/0.73  [8]~P1(x81)+~P1(x82)+P2(x81)+P2(x82)+P4(a2,x81)
% 0.59/0.73  %EqnAxiom
% 0.59/0.73  
% 0.59/0.73  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(11,plain,
% 0.59/0.73     (~P1(a2)+P1(f3(a2))),
% 0.59/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,5,4])).
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(13,plain,
% 0.59/0.73     (~P1(a2)+P3(f3(a2),a2)),
% 0.59/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,7,4])).
% 0.59/0.73  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.59/0.73     (~P4(a2,f3(a2))+~P1(a2)+~P1(f3(a2))),
% 0.59/0.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,9])).
% 0.59/0.74  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.59/0.74     (~P4(a2,f3(a2))+~P1(a2)),
% 0.59/0.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,11])).
% 0.59/0.74  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.59/0.74     (P2(f3(a2))+~P1(f3(a2))+~P1(a2)),
% 0.59/0.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,17,8])).
% 0.59/0.74  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.59/0.74     (P2(a2)+~P1(a2)+~P1(f3(a2))),
% 0.59/0.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,6])).
% 0.59/0.74  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.59/0.74     (P2(a2)+~P1(a2)),
% 0.59/0.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,11])).
% 0.59/0.74  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.59/0.74     (~P1(a2)),
% 0.59/0.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,20,4])).
% 0.59/0.74  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.59/0.74     (P2(x221)+~P1(x221)),
% 0.59/0.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,3])).
% 0.59/0.74  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.59/0.74     ($false),
% 0.59/0.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,22]),
% 0.59/0.74     ['proof']).
% 0.59/0.74  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.59/0.74  % Total time :0.040000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------