↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN071+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SYN071+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 19:32:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.53/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.65  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.56/0.65  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.65  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.56/0.65  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.56/0.65  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.56/0.65  
% 0.56/0.65  % Result      :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.56/0.65  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.56/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  % File     : SYN071+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.56/0.66  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.56/0.66  % Problem  : Pelletier Problem 48
% 0.56/0.66  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.56/0.66  % English  :
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  % Refs     : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.56/0.66  %          : [Rud93] Rudnicki (1993), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.56/0.66  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.56/0.66  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.56/0.66  % Names    : Pelletier 48 [Pel86]
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.56/0.66  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.3.0, 0.11 v3.2.0, 0.00 v3.1.0, 0.17 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.56/0.66  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   6 equ)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of connectives :    3 (   0   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
% 0.56/0.66  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   0 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)
% 0.56/0.66  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_PEQ
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  % Comments : [Pel86] says that Rudnicki has not published this problem
% 0.56/0.66  %            anywhere.
% 0.56/0.66  %          : [Rud93] says "I have seen it for the first time around 1977,
% 0.56/0.66  %            it was shown to me by A. Trybulec but I am sure it is folklore."
% 0.56/0.66  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  fof(pel48_1,axiom,
% 0.56/0.66      ( a = b
% 0.56/0.66      | c = d ) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  fof(pel48_2,axiom,
% 0.56/0.66      ( a = c
% 0.56/0.66      | b = d ) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  fof(pel48,conjecture,
% 0.56/0.66      ( a = d
% 0.56/0.66      | b = c ) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  % Proof found
% 0.56/0.66  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.66  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.66  %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:3)
% 0.56/0.66  %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.56/0.66  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.56/0.66  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.56/0.66  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.56/0.66  %goalClause: 4 5
% 0.56/0.66  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.56/0.66  [4]~E(a1,a3)
% 0.56/0.66  [5]~E(a4,a2)
% 0.56/0.66  [6]E(a1,a2)+E(a3,a4)
% 0.56/0.66  [7]E(a3,a2)+E(a1,a4)
% 0.56/0.66  %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.66  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.56/0.66  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.56/0.66  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  cnf(9,plain,
% 0.56/0.66     (E(a2,a3)+E(a1,a4)),
% 0.56/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,2])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(12,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (~E(a1,a2)+E(a1,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,9,3])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(13,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (E(a1,a4)+E(a3,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,6])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (E(a4,a1)+E(a3,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,2])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(15,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (~E(a1,a2)+E(a3,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,14,3])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(16,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (E(a3,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,6])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (E(a4,a3)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,2])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (~E(a2,a1)+E(a1,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (~E(x191,a1)+~E(a2,x191)+E(a1,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,3])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (~E(a3,a1)+E(a1,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,9])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (~E(a3,a1)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,4,20,3])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (~E(a1,a4)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,17,2,3])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     (E(a2,a3)),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,9])).
% 0.56/0.67  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.56/0.67     ($false),
% 0.56/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,5,16,3,2]),
% 0.56/0.67     ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.67  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.67  % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------