%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : SYN073+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 05:36:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN073+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 5 08:11:06 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.25/1.62 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.25/1.62 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.25/1.62 fof(pel50, conjecture, (![X1]:(big_f(a,X1)|![X2]:big_f(X1,X2))=>?[X3]:![X4]:big_f(X3,X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', pel50)).
% 0.25/1.62 fof(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1]:(big_f(a,X1)|![X2]:big_f(X1,X2))=>?[X3]:![X4]:big_f(X3,X4))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel50])).
% 0.25/1.62 fof(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X9, X10, X11]:((big_f(a,X9)|big_f(X9,X10))&~big_f(X11,esk1_1(X11))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_1])])])])).
% 0.25/1.62 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (~big_f(X1,esk1_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]), ['final']).
% 0.25/1.62 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (big_f(a,X1)|big_f(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]), ['final']).
% 0.25/1.63 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (big_f(esk1_1(a),X1)), inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_3,i_0_4])).
% 0.25/1.63 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (~big_f(X1,esk1_1(X1))), inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_3])).
% 0.25/1.63 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (big_f(a,X1)|big_f(X1,X2)), inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_4])).
% 0.25/1.63 cnf(i_0_8,plain, ($false), inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0+3, i_0_5]), ['proof']).
% 0.25/1.63 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.25/1.63 % Total time : 1.271s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------