↑ Up

LEO-II---2.3.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LEO-II---2.3.1
% Problem  : SYN073+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Oct  7 11:02:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   68 (  19 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (   9   ~;   8   |;   0   &;  57   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0   ^;  33   !;   6   ?;  39   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_a,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(tp_big_f,type,
    big_f: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(tp_sK1_SY5,type,
    sK1_SY5: $i > $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X: $i] :
        ( ( big_f @ a @ X )
        | ! [Y: $i] : ( big_f @ X @ Y ) )
   => ? [X1: $i] :
      ! [Y1: $i] : ( big_f @ X1 @ Y1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel50) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] :
          ( ( big_f @ a @ X )
          | ! [Y: $i] : ( big_f @ X @ Y ) )
     => ? [X1: $i] :
        ! [Y1: $i] : ( big_f @ X1 @ Y1 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] :
          ( ( big_f @ a @ X )
          | ! [Y: $i] : ( big_f @ X @ Y ) )
     => ? [X1: $i] :
        ! [Y1: $i] : ( big_f @ X1 @ Y1 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] :
          ( ( big_f @ a @ X )
          | ! [Y: $i] : ( big_f @ X @ Y ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(standard_cnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ? [X1: $i] :
        ! [Y1: $i] : ( big_f @ X1 @ Y1 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(standard_cnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( ~ ? [X1: $i] :
          ! [Y1: $i] : ( big_f @ X1 @ Y1 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] :
          ( ( big_f @ a @ X )
          | ! [Y: $i] : ( big_f @ X @ Y ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ~ ? [X1: $i] :
          ! [Y1: $i] : ( big_f @ X1 @ Y1 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ~ ~ ! [SX0: $i] :
              ~ ! [SX1: $i] : ( big_f @ SX0 @ SX1 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( big_f @ a @ SV1 )
        | ! [SY4: $i] : ( big_f @ SV1 @ SY4 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] :
            ~ ! [SX1: $i] : ( big_f @ SX0 @ SX1 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( big_f @ a @ SV1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ! [SY4: $i] : ( big_f @ SV1 @ SY4 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( ! [SX0: $i] :
          ~ ! [SX1: $i] : ( big_f @ SX0 @ SX1 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( big_f @ SV1 @ SV2 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( big_f @ a @ SV1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ! [SY5: $i] : ( big_f @ SV3 @ SY5 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i] :
      ( ( ! [SY5: $i] : ( big_f @ SV3 @ SY5 ) )
      = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i] :
      ( ( big_f @ SV3 @ ( sK1_SY5 @ SV3 ) )
      = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_neg,[status(esa)],[16]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[14,17]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[18]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN073+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.16  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.16  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.16  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.16  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.16  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.16  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.16  % DateTime : Tue Oct  6 17:16:17 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.16  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.16  Running leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.19  
% 0.09/0.19   No.of.Axioms: 0
% 0.09/0.19  
% 0.09/0.19   Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.09/0.19  
% 0.09/0.19   Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.09/0.19  
% 0.09/0.19  ********************************
% 0.09/0.19  *   All subproblems solved!    *
% 0.09/0.19  ********************************
% 0.09/0.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:1,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:false,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:299,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:18,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
% 0.09/0.19  
% 0.09/0.19  %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.09/0.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.19  
% 0.09/0.19  %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.09/0.19  %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 19 ****
% 0.09/0.19  %**** clause counter: 18 ****
% 0.09/0.19  
% 0.09/0.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:1,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:false,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:299,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:18,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------