↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN074+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.42s 1.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN074+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 20:26:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.49/0.54  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 1.42/1.51  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.42/1.51  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 1.42/1.51  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 1.42/1.51  % Transform   :cnf
% 1.42/1.51  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 1.42/1.51  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 1.42/1.51  
% 1.42/1.51  % Result      :Theorem 0.940000s
% 1.42/1.51  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.940000s
% 1.42/1.51  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.42/1.51  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.42/1.51  % File     : SYN074+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 1.42/1.51  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 1.42/1.51  % Problem  : Pelletier Problem 51
% 1.42/1.51  % Version  : Especial.
% 1.42/1.51  % English  :
% 1.42/1.51  
% 1.42/1.51  % Refs     : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 1.42/1.51  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 1.42/1.51  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 1.42/1.51  % Names    : Pelletier 51 [Pel86]
% 1.42/1.51  
% 1.42/1.51  % Status   : Theorem
% 1.42/1.51  % Rating   : 0.17 v8.1.0, 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.16 v6.1.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.17 v5.5.0, 0.15 v5.4.0, 0.18 v5.3.0, 0.26 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.22 v4.0.0, 0.21 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0, 0.11 v3.2.0, 0.33 v3.1.0, 0.17 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 1.42/1.51  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 1.42/1.51  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   4 equ)
% 1.42/1.51  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
% 1.42/1.51  %            Number of connectives :    4 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
% 1.42/1.51  %                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 1.42/1.51  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   7 avg)
% 1.42/1.51  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 1.42/1.51  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 1.42/1.51  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 1.42/1.51  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   4   !;   4   ?)
% 1.42/1.51  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 1.42/1.51  
% 1.42/1.51  % Comments :
% 1.42/1.51  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.42/1.51  %----Problem axioms
% 1.42/1.51  fof(pel51_1,axiom,
% 1.42/1.51      ? [Z,W] :
% 1.42/1.51      ! [X,Y] :
% 1.42/1.51        ( big_f(X,Y)
% 1.42/1.51      <=> ( X = Z
% 1.42/1.51          & Y = W ) ) ).
% 1.42/1.51  
% 1.42/1.51  fof(pel51,conjecture,
% 1.42/1.51      ? [Z] :
% 1.42/1.51      ! [X] :
% 1.42/1.51        ( ? [W] :
% 1.42/1.51          ! [Y] :
% 1.42/1.51            ( big_f(X,Y)
% 1.42/1.51          <=> Y = W )
% 1.42/1.51      <=> X = Z ) ).
% 1.42/1.51  
% 1.42/1.51  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.42/1.51  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.42/1.51  % Proof found
% 1.42/1.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.42/1.51  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.42/1.51  %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:9)
% 1.42/1.51  %VarNum:38(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 1.42/1.51  %MaxLitNum:3
% 1.42/1.51  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 1.42/1.51  %SharedTerms:2
% 1.42/1.51  %goalClause: 13 14 15 16
% 1.42/1.51  [11]~P1(x111,x112)+E(x111,a2)
% 1.42/1.51  [12]~P1(x122,x121)+E(x121,a1)
% 1.42/1.51  [10]P1(x101,x102)+~E(x102,a1)+~E(x101,a2)
% 1.42/1.51  [13]~E(x132,f4(x131))+E(f3(x131),x131)+P1(f3(x131),x132)
% 1.42/1.51  [14]E(f3(x142),x142)+~P1(f3(x142),x141)+E(x141,f4(x142))
% 1.42/1.51  [15]~E(f3(x151),x151)+E(f5(x151,x152),x152)+P1(f3(x151),f5(x151,x152))
% 1.42/1.51  [16]~E(f3(x161),x161)+~E(f5(x161,x162),x162)+~P1(f3(x161),f5(x161,x162))
% 1.42/1.51  %EqnAxiom
% 1.42/1.51  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 1.42/1.51  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 1.42/1.51  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 1.42/1.51  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41),f3(x42))
% 1.42/1.51  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f5(x51,x53),f5(x52,x53))
% 1.42/1.51  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x63,x61),f5(x63,x62))
% 1.42/1.51  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f4(x71),f4(x72))
% 1.42/1.51  [8]P1(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x81,x83)
% 1.42/1.51  [9]P1(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x91)
% 1.42/1.51  
% 1.42/1.51  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(17,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(f3(x171),x171)+P1(f3(x171),f4(x171))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(equality_inference,[],[13])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(20,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(f3(x201),x201)+E(f3(x201),a2)),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,17])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(38,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(f5(a2,x381),x381)+P1(f3(a2),f5(a2,x381))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,20])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(39,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(x391,f5(a2,x391))+P1(f3(a2),f5(a2,x391))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[38,2])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(40,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (P1(f3(a2),f5(a2,x401))+E(f3(x401),f3(f5(a2,x401)))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[39,4])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(42,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~E(f5(a2,x421),x421)+~P1(f3(a2),f5(a2,x421))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,20])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(51,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(f5(x511,x512),f5(x511,x513))+~E(x513,x512)),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(55,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(a2,x551)+~P1(x551,x552)),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,11])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(56,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(f3(x561),x561)+E(a2,f3(x561))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[55,17])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(61,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(a1,x611)+~P1(x612,x611)),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(86,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~E(a1,x861)+P1(x862,x861)+~E(x862,a2)),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,10])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(92,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(f3(f5(a2,x921)),f3(x921))+P1(f3(a2),f5(a2,x921))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,40])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(107,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (E(x1071,f3(x1071))+E(a2,f3(x1071))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,56])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(144,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~E(a2,x1441)+P1(x1441,x1442)+~E(a1,x1442)),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,86])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(145,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~E(f5(a2,x1451),x1451)+~E(a1,f5(a2,x1451))+~E(a2,f3(a2))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[144,42])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(146,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~E(f5(a2,x1461),x1461)+~E(a1,f5(a2,x1461))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[145,107])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(156,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~E(x1561,f5(a2,x1561))+~E(a1,f5(a2,x1561))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,146])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(157,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~P1(x1571,f5(a2,a1))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[156,61])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(159,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~P1(x1591,f5(a2,a1))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(rename_variables,[],[157])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(162,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~P1(x1621,f5(a2,a1))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(rename_variables,[],[157])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(165,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     (~P1(x1651,f5(a2,a1))),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(rename_variables,[],[157])).
% 1.42/1.52  cnf(171,plain,
% 1.42/1.52     ($false),
% 1.42/1.52     inference(scs_inference,[],[157,159,162,165,38,39,40,51,92,146]),
% 1.42/1.52     ['proof']).
% 1.42/1.52  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.42/1.52  % Total time :0.940000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------