↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.83s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  150 (  95 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  173 (  70   ~;  80   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   89 (   0 sgn  71   !;  18   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( big_f(X2,X3)
    <=> ( X3 = X1
        & X2 = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel51_1) ).

fof(f2,conjecture,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
        ! [X3] :
          ( big_f(X1,X3)
        <=> X3 = X2 )
    <=> X1 = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel51) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
          ! [X3] :
            ( big_f(X1,X3)
          <=> X3 = X2 )
      <=> X1 = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
        ! [X3] :
          ( big_f(X1,X3)
        <=> X3 = X2 )
    <~> X1 = X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( X3 = X1
          & X2 = X0 ) )
      & ( X1 != X3
        | X0 != X2
        | big_f(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( X3 = X1
          & X2 = X0 ) )
      & ( X1 != X3
        | X0 != X2
        | big_f(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( sK1 = X3
          & sK0 = X2 ) )
      & ( sK1 != X3
        | sK0 != X2
        | big_f(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
      ( ( ? [X2] :
          ! [X3] :
            ( ( ~ big_f(X1,X3)
              | X3 = X2 )
            & ( X2 != X3
              | big_f(X1,X3) ) )
        | X1 = X0 )
      & ( ! [X2] :
          ? [X3] :
            ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
              | X3 = X2 )
            & ( ~ big_f(X1,X3)
              | X2 != X3 ) )
        | X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
      ( ( ? [X4] :
          ! [X5] :
            ( ( ~ big_f(X1,X5)
              | X4 = X5 )
            & ( X4 != X5
              | big_f(X1,X5) ) )
        | X1 = X0 )
      & ( ! [X2] :
          ? [X3] :
            ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
              | X3 = X2 )
            & ( ~ big_f(X1,X3)
              | X2 != X3 ) )
        | X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ! [X5] :
            ( ( ~ big_f(sK2(X0),X5)
              | sK4(X0) = X5 )
            & ( sK4(X0) != X5
              | big_f(sK2(X0),X5) ) )
        | sK2(X0) = X0 )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( ( big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,X2))
              | sK3(X0,X2) = X2 )
            & ( ~ big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,X2))
              | sK3(X0,X2) != X2 ) )
        | sK2(X0) != X0 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X1,sK2(X0)),skolemize(X3,sK3(X0,X2)),skolemize(X4,sK4(X0))],[f9]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | sK1 = X3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | sK0 = X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( sK1 != X3
      | sK0 != X2
      | big_f(X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0,X5] :
      ( sK4(X0) != X5
      | big_f(sK2(X0),X5)
      | sK2(X0) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X0] :
      ( big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,X2))
      | sK3(X0,X2) = X2
      | sK2(X0) != X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X2,X0] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,X2))
      | sK3(X0,X2) != X2
      | sK2(X0) != X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( sK1 != X3
      | big_f(sK0,X3) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    big_f(sK0,sK1),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( big_f(sK2(X0),sK4(X0))
      | sK2(X0) = X0 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    big_f(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sK0 )
      | ~ big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = sK1 )
      | ~ big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,X1))
      | ( sK2(X0) != X0 )
      | ( sK3(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,X1))
      | ( sK3(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ( sK2(X0) != X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK2(X0),sK4(X0))
      | ( sK2(X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_206,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = sK0 )
      | ( sK2(X0) = X0 )
      | ( sK4(X0) != X2 )
      | ( sK2(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_207,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK2(X0) = sK0 )
      | ( sK2(X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_206]) ).

tcf(c_208,plain,
    sK2(sK0) = sK0,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_207]) ).

tcf(c_297,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK2(X0),sK4(X0))
      | ( sK2(X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

tcf(c_298,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,X1))
      | ( sK3(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ( sK2(X0) != X0 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

tcf(c_299,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,X1))
      | ( sK2(X0) != X0 )
      | ( sK3(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

tcf(c_303,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( big_f(X0,X2)
      | ~ big_f(X1,X3)
      | ( X2 != X3 )
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    theory(equality) ).

tcf(c_430,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK2(X0) = sK0 )
      | ( sK2(X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_297,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_447,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK2(X0) = sK0 )
      | ( X0 != sK0 ) ),
    inference(equality_factoring,[status(thm)],[c_430]) ).

tcf(c_474,plain,
    sK2(sK0) = sK0,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_447]) ).

tcf(c_514,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK2(sK0),sK3(sK0,X0))
      | ( sK3(sK0,X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_474,c_298]) ).

tcf(c_517,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK0,sK3(sK0,X0))
      | ( sK3(sK0,X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_514,c_474]) ).

tcf(c_521,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(X0,X1)
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
      | ( X1 != sK1 )
      | ( X0 != sK0 ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_303]) ).

tcf(c_532,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK3(sK0,X0) = sK1 )
      | ( sK3(sK0,X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_517,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_541,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(X1,sK3(X0,sK1))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
      | ( X1 != sK0 )
      | ( sK3(X0,sK1) != sK1 ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_521]) ).

tcf(c_567,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK3(sK0,X0) = sK1 )
      | ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
    inference(equality_factoring,[status(thm)],[c_532]) ).

tcf(c_810,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,sK1))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
      | ( sK2(X0) != sK0 )
      | ( sK3(X0,sK1) != sK1 ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_541]) ).

tcf(c_811,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK2(X0),sK3(X0,sK1))
      | ( sK2(X0) != X0 )
      | ( sK3(X0,sK1) != sK1 ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_299]) ).

tcf(c_812,plain,
    ( big_f(sK2(sK0),sK3(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
    | ( sK2(sK0) != sK0 )
    | ( sK3(sK0,sK1) != sK1 ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_810]) ).

tcf(c_813,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK2(sK0),sK3(sK0,sK1))
    | ( sK2(sK0) != sK0 )
    | ( sK3(sK0,sK1) != sK1 ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_811]) ).

tcf(c_851,plain,
    sK3(sK0,sK1) = sK1,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_567]) ).

tcf(c_852,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_851,c_813,c_812,c_208,c_49]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:07:43 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.44  % Proving...
% 1.83/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.83/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.83/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.83/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % 
% 1.83/1.29  % clauses                               7
% 1.83/1.29  % conjectures                           4
% 1.83/1.29  % EPR                                   3
% 1.83/1.29  % Horn                                  4
% 1.83/1.29  % unary                                 1
% 1.83/1.29  % binary                                3
% 1.83/1.29  % lits                                  16
% 1.83/1.29  % lits eq                               9
% 1.83/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.83/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.83/1.29  % fd_cond                               2
% 1.83/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.83/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ 
% 1.83/1.29  % Current options:
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ 
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % 
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 1.83/1.29  % 
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.83/1.29  
% 1.83/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------