↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SYN078+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:09:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.42s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel56,conjecture,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( ? [Y] :
            ( X = f(Y)
            & big_p(Y) )
       => big_p(X) )
  <=> ! [U] :
        ( big_p(U)
       => big_p(f(U)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',pel56) ).

fof(f_1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X] :
          ( ? [Y] :
              ( X = f(Y)
              & big_p(Y) )
         => big_p(X) )
    <=> ! [U] :
          ( big_p(U)
         => big_p(f(U)) ) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[pel56]) ).

fof(f_1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [X] :
          ( ~ big_p(X)
          & ? [Y] :
              ( X = f(Y)
              & big_p(Y) ) )
      & ! [U] :
          ( big_p(f(U))
          | ~ big_p(U) ) )
    | ( ? [U] :
          ( ~ big_p(f(U))
          & big_p(U) )
      & ! [X] :
          ( big_p(X)
          | ! [Y] :
              ( X != f(Y)
              | ~ big_p(Y) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

fof(f_1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [U_5] :
          ( ~ big_p(U_5)
          & ? [U_4] :
              ( U_5 = f(U_4)
              & big_p(U_4) ) )
      & ! [U_3] :
          ( big_p(f(U_3))
          | ~ big_p(U_3) ) )
    | ( ? [U_2] :
          ( ~ big_p(f(U_2))
          & big_p(U_2) )
      & ! [U_1] :
          ( big_p(U_1)
          | ! [U_0] :
              ( U_1 != f(U_0)
              | ~ big_p(U_0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_1_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [U_5] :
          ( ~ big_p(U_5)
          & ? [U_4] :
              ( U_5 = f(U_4)
              & big_p(U_4) ) )
      & ! [U_3] :
          ( big_p(f(U_3))
          | ~ big_p(U_3) ) )
    | ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
      & big_p(sK1)
      & ! [U_1] :
          ( big_p(U_1)
          | ! [U_0] :
              ( U_1 != f(U_0)
              | ~ big_p(U_0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_2,sK1)],[f_1_3]) ).

fof(f_1_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ big_p(sK2)
      & ? [U_4] :
          ( sK2 = f(U_4)
          & big_p(U_4) )
      & ! [U_3] :
          ( big_p(f(U_3))
          | ~ big_p(U_3) ) )
    | ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
      & big_p(sK1)
      & ! [U_1] :
          ( big_p(U_1)
          | ! [U_0] :
              ( U_1 != f(U_0)
              | ~ big_p(U_0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_5,sK2)],[f_1_4]) ).

fof(f_1_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ big_p(sK2)
      & sK2 = f(sK3)
      & big_p(sK3)
      & ! [U_3] :
          ( big_p(f(U_3))
          | ~ big_p(U_3) ) )
    | ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
      & big_p(sK1)
      & ! [U_1] :
          ( big_p(U_1)
          | ! [U_0] :
              ( U_1 != f(U_0)
              | ~ big_p(U_0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_4,sK3)],[f_1_5]) ).

fof(f_1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_3] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK2)
        | ~ sP1(U_3) )
    & ! [U_3] :
        ( sK2 = f(sK3)
        | ~ sP1(U_3) )
    & ! [U_3] :
        ( big_p(sK3)
        | ~ sP1(U_3) )
    & ! [U_3] :
        ( big_p(f(U_3))
        | ~ big_p(U_3)
        | ~ sP1(U_3) )
    & ! [U_1,U_0] :
        ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
        | ~ sP0(U_1,U_0) )
    & ! [U_1,U_0] :
        ( big_p(sK1)
        | ~ sP0(U_1,U_0) )
    & ! [U_1,U_0] :
        ( big_p(U_1)
        | U_1 != f(U_0)
        | ~ big_p(U_0)
        | ~ sP0(U_1,U_0) )
    & ! [U_3,U_1,U_0] :
        ( sP1(U_3)
        | sP0(U_1,U_0) ) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa),new_symbols(definitional,[sP0,sP1])],[f_1_6]) ).

cnf(f_1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP1(U_3)
    | sP0(U_1,U_0) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(U_1)
    | U_1 != f(U_0)
    | ~ big_p(U_0)
    | ~ sP0(U_1,U_0) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | ~ sP0(U_1,U_0) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
    | ~ sP0(U_1,U_0) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(f(U_3))
    | ~ big_p(U_3)
    | ~ sP1(U_3) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(sK3)
    | ~ sP1(U_3) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK2 = f(sK3)
    | ~ sP1(U_3) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(sK2)
    | ~ sP1(U_3) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(equality_1,axiom,
    Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
    theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(equality_4,axiom,
    ( f(Eq_x_0) = f(Eq_y_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_5,axiom,
    ( big_p(Eq_y_0)
    | ~ big_p(Eq_x_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(equality_6,axiom,
    ( sP0(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
    | ~ sP0(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1)
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(equality_7,axiom,
    ( sP1(Eq_y_0)
    | ~ sP1(Eq_x_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(sat_proved,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cadical,[status(thm)],[]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN078+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 06:23:38 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------