↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN078+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:36:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   89 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   17 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (  34   ~;  40   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  13   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel56,conjecture,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( ? [Y] :
            ( X = f(Y)
            & big_p(Y) )
       => big_p(X) )
  <=> ! [U] :
        ( big_p(U)
       => big_p(f(U)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',pel56) ).

fof(pel56_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X] :
          ( ? [Y] :
              ( X = f(Y)
              & big_p(Y) )
         => big_p(X) )
    <=> ! [U] :
          ( big_p(U)
         => big_p(f(U)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel56]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ( ( ? [U] :
          ( ~ big_p(f(U))
          & big_p(U) )
      | ? [X] :
          ( ~ big_p(X)
          & ? [Y] :
              ( f(Y) = X
              & big_p(Y) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X2] :
          ( big_p(f(X2))
          | ~ big_p(X2) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( big_p(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( f(X1) != X0
              | ~ big_p(X1) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel56_neg]) ).

fof(sk_pel56_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
        & big_p(sK1) )
      | ( ~ big_p(sK2)
        & f(sK0) = sK2
        & big_p(sK0) ) )
    & ( ! [X2] :
          ( big_p(f(X2))
          | ~ big_p(X2) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( big_p(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( f(X1) != X0
              | ~ big_p(X1) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK2,sK1]),skolemize(X,sK2),skolemize(Y,sK0),skolemize(U,sK1)],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_pel56_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
      | ~ big_p(sK2) )
    & ( big_p(sK1)
      | ~ big_p(sK2) )
    & ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
      | f(sK0) = sK2 )
    & ( big_p(sK1)
      | f(sK0) = sK2 )
    & ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
      | big_p(sK0) )
    & ( big_p(sK1)
      | big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( big_p(f(VAR_2))
        | ~ big_p(VAR_2)
        | big_p(VAR_1)
        | f(VAR_0) != VAR_1
        | ~ big_p(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_pel56_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(f(C))
    | ~ big_p(C)
    | big_p(B)
    | f(A) != B
    | ~ big_p(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel56_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel56_neg]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel56_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | f(sK0) = sK2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel56_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
    | f(sK0) = sK2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel56_neg]) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | ~ big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel56_neg]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(f(sK1))
    | ~ big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pel56_neg]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( big_p(f(A))
    | big_p(B)
    | f(A) != B
    | ~ big_p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ( big_p(f(A))
    | f(A) != f(A)
    | ~ big_p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_9]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( big_p(f(A))
    | ~ big_p(A) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_25]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( f(sK0) = sK2
    | big_p(f(sK1)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( big_p(sK0)
    | big_p(f(sK1)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(sK0) = sK2
    | f(sK0) = sK2 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_16,negated_conjecture,
    f(sK0) = sK2,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_26]) ).

cnf(c_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(sK0)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    big_p(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_27]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    big_p(f(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    big_p(sK2),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_p(f(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    big_p(sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_p(sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_29]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SYN078+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:09:59 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/0.44  % Process 1120139 was started by sandbox2 on n011,
% 0.18/0.44  % Sat Sep 26 17:09:59 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.18/0.45  % Length of proof is 18.
% 0.18/0.45  % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.18/0.45  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.18/0.45  % Given clauses 13.
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------