↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN079+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:30 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.52s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem    : SYN079+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 18:53:24 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.52/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.52/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.59  
% 0.52/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  % File     : SYN079+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.52/0.60  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.52/0.60  % Problem  : Pelletier Problem 57
% 0.52/0.60  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.52/0.60  % English  :
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Refs     : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.52/0.60  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.52/0.60  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.52/0.60  % Names    : Pelletier 57 [Pel86]
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.52/0.60  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.52/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of connectives :    2 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
% 0.52/0.60  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.60  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   3   !;   0   ?)
% 0.52/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  % Comments :
% 0.52/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  fof(pel57_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      big_f(f(a,b),f(b,c)) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  fof(pel57_2,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      big_f(f(b,c),f(a,c)) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  fof(pel57_3,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.52/0.60        ( ( big_f(X,Y)
% 0.52/0.60          & big_f(Y,Z) )
% 0.52/0.60       => big_f(X,Z) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  fof(pel57,conjecture,
% 0.52/0.60      big_f(f(a,b),f(a,c)) ).
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.60  %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.52/0.60  %VarNum:6(SingletonVarNum:3)
% 0.52/0.60  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.52/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.52/0.60  %SharedTerms:9
% 0.52/0.60  %goalClause: 3
% 0.52/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.52/0.60  [1]P1(f3(a1,a2),f3(a2,a4))
% 0.52/0.60  [2]P1(f3(a2,a4),f3(a1,a4))
% 0.52/0.60  [3]~P1(f3(a1,a2),f3(a1,a4))
% 0.52/0.60  [4]~P1(x41,x43)+P1(x41,x42)+~P1(x43,x42)
% 0.52/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60  cnf(5,plain,
% 0.52/0.60     ($false),
% 0.52/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,2,1,4]),
% 0.52/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.60  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------