↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN080+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:07:08 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.66s 3.86s
% Output   : Proof 3.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SYN080+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:29:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.66/3.86  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/3.86  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq (f X) (g Y)) True
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq (f (f X)) (f (g Y)))) True
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #2 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (f a) (g Y)) True
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (f a) (g a_1)) True
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (f a) (g a_1)
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #6 (by superposition #[4, 4]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (f a) (f a_1)
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #7 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), Eq (f (f X)) (f (g Y))) False
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (f (f (skS.0 0 a))) (f (g Y)))) True
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (f (f (skS.0 0 a))) (f (g Y))) False
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (Eq (f (f (skS.0 0 a))) (f (g (skS.0 1 a a_1))))) True
% 3.66/3.86  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (f (f (skS.0 0 a))) (f (g (skS.0 1 a a_1)))) False
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Ne (f (f (skS.0 0 a))) (f (g (skS.0 1 a a_1)))
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #13 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[12, 6]): False
% 3.66/3.87  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------