%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:49:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.48s 2.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 4 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
f(f(esk1_0)) != f(g(esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8mqbcmnd/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
g(X1) = f(X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8mqbcmnd/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
f(f(esk1_0)) != f(g(esk2_0)),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
g(X1) = f(X2),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:38:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.48/2.56 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.48/2.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.48/2.56 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.48/2.56 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____Y1145__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 8.48/2.56 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 8.48/2.56 #
% 8.48/2.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 8.48/2.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.48/2.56
% 8.48/2.56 # Proof found!
% 8.48/2.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.48/2.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.48/2.56 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.48/2.56
% 8.48/2.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.48/2.56 # User time : 0.013 s
% 8.48/2.56 # System time : 0.006 s
% 8.48/2.56 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 8.48/2.56 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.48/2.56
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------