↑ Up

SInE---0.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SYN080+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 13:13:08 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   2 sgn   8   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : f(f(X1)) = f(g(X2)),
    file('/tmp/tmpZkDbPf/sel_SYN080+1.p_1',pel58) ).

fof(2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : f(X1) = g(X2),
    file('/tmp/tmpZkDbPf/sel_SYN080+1.p_1',pel58_1) ).

fof(3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : f(f(X1)) = f(g(X2)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

fof(4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2] : f(f(X1)) != f(g(X2)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

fof(5,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X3,X4] : f(f(X3)) != f(g(X4)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

fof(6,negated_conjecture,
    f(f(esk1_0)) != f(g(esk2_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

cnf(7,negated_conjecture,
    f(f(esk1_0)) != f(g(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

fof(8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : f(X3) = g(X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(9,plain,
    f(X1) = g(X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[7,9,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    12,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN080+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpZkDbPf/sel_SYN080+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SYN080+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN080+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN080+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------