↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN080+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.48s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  19 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   7   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn  11   !;   2   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : f(X0) = g(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel58_1) ).

fof(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : f(f(X0)) = f(g(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel58) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] : f(f(X0)) = f(g(X1)),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] : f(f(X0)) != f(g(X1)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    f(f(sK0)) != f(g(sK1)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : f(X0) = g(X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    f(f(sK0)) != f(g(sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : f(X0) = g(X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    f(f(sK0)) != f(g(sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_60,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = f(sK0),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_61,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = f(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_62,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = g(sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_63,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = f(iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_62,c_63,c_60,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : f(X0) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_108,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_109,plain,
    iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_109]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_110]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN080+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:02:31 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.48/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.48/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.48/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.48/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 1.48/1.28  % 
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 1.48/1.28   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % 
% 1.48/1.28  % clauses                               6
% 1.48/1.28  % conjectures                           1
% 1.48/1.28  % EPR                                   1
% 1.48/1.28  % Horn                                  6
% 1.48/1.28  % unary                                 6
% 1.48/1.28  % binary                                0
% 1.48/1.28  % lits                                  6
% 1.48/1.28  % lits eq                               6
% 1.48/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.48/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.48/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.48/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.48/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Schedule UEQ
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.48/1.28  % Current options:
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % 
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.48/1.28  % 
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.48/1.28  
% 1.48/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------