%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN084-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_14ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_18ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
big_p(a),
clause_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(b)
| big_p(f(b)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(X1)
| big_p(f(f(X1))) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
big_p(f(f(b))),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
big_p(f(f(f(b)))),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
big_p(f(f(f(f(b))))),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(X1)
| big_p(f(f(f(X1)))) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
big_p(f(f(f(f(f(b)))))),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(X1)
| big_p(f(f(f(f(X1))))) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
big_p(f(f(f(f(f(f(b))))))),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(f(X1))
| big_p(f(f(X1))) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_11])]),c_0_17]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(X1)
| big_p(f(f(f(f(f(X1)))))) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
big_p(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(b)))))))),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN084-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:43:13 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % new_bool_1 with pid 1540905 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.42 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1540907 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.42 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.15/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Initial clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.15/0.42 % Processed clauses : 32
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % ...subsumed : 7
% 0.15/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.15/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 12
% 0.15/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Generated clauses : 49
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 49
% 0.15/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.15/0.42 % Paramodulations : 29
% 0.15/0.42 % Factorizations : 20
% 0.15/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 61
% 0.15/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 61
% 0.15/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.15/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.15/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 33
% 0.15/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.15/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1272
% 0.15/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 38
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------