%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:30:13 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s % Output : Refutation 0.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28094/SYN/SYN085-1.010+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ............ done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 11] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11] % Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: ~p_0 % B11: ~p_1 | ~p_10 | ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 | p_0 % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_1 % U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_10 % U3: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_2 % U4: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_3 % U5: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_4 % U6: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_5 % U7: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_6 % U8: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_7 % U9: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_8 % U10: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_9 % U11: < d10 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > ~p_9 % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U1: % p_1 ....... U1 % Derivation of unit clause U2: % p_10 ....... U2 % Derivation of unit clause U3: % p_2 ....... U3 % Derivation of unit clause U4: % p_3 ....... U4 % Derivation of unit clause U5: % p_4 ....... U5 % Derivation of unit clause U6: % p_5 ....... U6 % Derivation of unit clause U7: % p_6 ....... U7 % Derivation of unit clause U8: % p_7 ....... U8 % Derivation of unit clause U9: % p_8 ....... U9 % Derivation of unit clause U10: % p_9 ....... U10 % Derivation of unit clause U11: % ~p_0 ....... B0 % ~p_1 | ~p_10 | ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 | p_0 ....... B11 % ~p_1 | ~p_10 | ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R1 [B0:L0, B11:L10] % p_1 ....... U1 % ~p_10 | ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0] % p_10 ....... U2 % ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R3 [R2:L0, U2:L0] % p_2 ....... U3 % ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R4 [R3:L0, U3:L0] % p_3 ....... U4 % ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R5 [R4:L0, U4:L0] % p_4 ....... U5 % ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R6 [R5:L0, U5:L0] % p_5 ....... U6 % ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R7 [R6:L0, U6:L0] % p_6 ....... U7 % ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R8 [R7:L0, U7:L0] % p_7 ....... U8 % ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R9 [R8:L0, U8:L0] % p_8 ....... U9 % ~p_9 ....... R10 [R9:L0, U9:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % ~p_9 ....... U11 % p_9 ....... U10 % [] ....... R1 [U11:L0, U10:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 21 % resolvents: 21 factors: 0 % Number of unit clauses generated: 1 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 4.76 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 11 [10] = 1 % Total = 12 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 1 [2] = 1 [3] = 1 [4] = 1 [5] = 1 [6] = 1 % [7] = 1 [8] = 1 [9] = 1 [10] = 12 % Average size of a generated clause: 8.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] p_0 (+)0 (-)1 % [1] p_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [2] p_10 (+)1 (-)0 % [3] p_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [4] p_3 (+)1 (-)0 % [5] p_4 (+)1 (-)0 % [6] p_5 (+)1 (-)0 % [7] p_6 (+)1 (-)0 % [8] p_7 (+)1 (-)0 % [9] p_8 (+)1 (-)0 % [10] p_9 (+)1 (-)1 % ------------------ % Total: (+)10 (-)2 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 12 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 99 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 31 % Number of unification failures: 0 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 120 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 0 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 0 % Number of states in UCFA table: 3 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 31 % ConstructUnitClause() = 1 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 1 secs % CPU time: 0.14 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------