%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:31 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 22:41:54 EDT 2024 % 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.53/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.53/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.53/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.53/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.53/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.53/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 % File : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.53/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.53/0.60 % Problem : Plaisted problem s(1,10) % 0.53/0.60 % Version : Biased. % 0.53/0.60 % English : % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Refs : [Pla94] Plaisted (1994), The Search Efficiency of Theorem Prov % 0.53/0.60 % Source : [Pla94] % 0.53/0.60 % Names : S1n [Pla94] % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.53/0.60 % Rating : 0.33 v5.5.0, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 0.53/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 11 neg) % 0.53/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 11 ( 1 avg) % 0.53/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of predicates : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 prp; 0-0 aty) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.53/0.60 % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn) % 0.53/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_PRP % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 % Comments : Biased away from various calculi. % 0.53/0.60 % : tptp2X: -f tptp -s10 SYN085-1.g % 0.53/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.60 cnf(s1_goal_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.53/0.60 ~ p_0 ). % 0.53/0.60 % 0.53/0.60 cnf(s1_1,axiom, % 0.53/0.60 ( p_0 % 0.55/0.60 | ~ p_1 % 0.55/0.60 | ~ p_2 % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p_3 % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p_4 % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p_5 % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p_6 % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p_7 % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p_8 % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p_9 % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p_10 ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_2,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_1 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_3,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_2 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_4,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_3 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_5,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_4 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_6,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_5 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_7,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_6 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_8,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_7 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_9,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_8 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_10,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_9 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(s1_11,axiom, % 0.55/0.61 p_10 ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 % Proof found % 0.55/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.61 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.55/0.61 %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0) % 0.55/0.61 %MaxLitNum:11 % 0.55/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.55/0.61 %SharedTerms:23 % 0.55/0.61 %goalClause: 11 % 0.55/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:1 % 0.55/0.61 [1]P1(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [2]P3(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [3]P5(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [4]P6(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [5]P7(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [6]P8(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [7]P9(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [8]P10(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [9]P11(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [10]P4(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [11]~P2(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 [12]P2(a5000)+~P1(a5000)+~P3(a5000)+~P5(a5000)+~P6(a5000)+~P7(a5000)+~P8(a5000)+~P9(a5000)+~P10(a5000)+~P11(a5000)+~P4(a5000) % 0.55/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 cnf(13,plain, % 0.55/0.61 ($false), % 0.55/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12]), % 0.55/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------