%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:32:29 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 24 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 57 ( 0 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 12 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(s1_1,axiom,
( ~ p_10
| ~ p_9
| ~ p_8
| ~ p_7
| ~ p_6
| ~ p_5
| ~ p_4
| ~ p_3
| ~ p_2
| ~ p_1
| p_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_1) ).
cnf(s1_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_goal_1) ).
cnf(s1_2,axiom,
p_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_2) ).
cnf(s1_3,axiom,
p_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_3) ).
cnf(s1_4,axiom,
p_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_4) ).
cnf(s1_5,axiom,
p_4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_5) ).
cnf(s1_6,axiom,
p_5,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_6) ).
cnf(s1_7,axiom,
p_6,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_7) ).
cnf(s1_8,axiom,
p_7,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_8) ).
cnf(s1_9,axiom,
p_8,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_9) ).
cnf(s1_10,axiom,
p_9,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_10) ).
cnf(s1_11,axiom,
p_10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_11) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ p_10
| ~ p_9
| ~ p_8
| ~ p_7
| ~ p_6
| ~ p_5
| ~ p_4
| ~ p_3
| ~ p_2
| ~ p_1
| p_0 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[s1_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p_0,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[s1_goal_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p_10
| ~ p_9
| ~ p_8
| ~ p_7
| ~ p_6
| ~ p_5
| ~ p_4
| ~ p_3
| ~ p_2
| ~ p_1
| p_0 ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
p_1,
s1_2 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
p_2,
s1_3 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
p_3,
s1_4 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
p_4,
s1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
p_5,
s1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
p_6,
s1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
p_7,
s1_8 ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
p_8,
s1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
p_9,
s1_10 ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
p_10,
s1_11 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ p_0,
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.54 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.54 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.54 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.54 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.54 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.54 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.54 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:42:36 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.54 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.59 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.59 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % new_bool_1 with pid 571406 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.13/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.60 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 571413 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.60 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.60
% 0.13/0.60 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.13/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Initial clauses : 12
% 0.13/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.13/0.60 % Processed clauses : 12
% 0.13/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.13/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.13/0.60 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.13/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.13/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 195
% 0.13/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 21
% 0.13/0.60
% 0.13/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.60 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.60 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.60 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.13/0.60
% 0.13/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.60 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.60 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.60 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------