%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN086-1.003 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:06 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 5.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_22ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_50ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ p_1_3,
c_0_19,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ q_2_2
| ~ p_3_3
| q_2_3 ),
c_0_20,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ p_2_3
| p_3_3 ),
c_0_21,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ q_2_3
| ~ q_1_2 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ q_2_2
| ~ p_2_3
| q_2_3 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ q_1_2
| q_2_2 ),
c_0_26,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ p_1_1
| ~ q_2_2
| q_1_2 ),
c_0_27,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ p_1_2
| p_1_1 ),
c_0_28,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ q_2_2
| ~ q_3_3
| p_2_3 ),
c_0_29,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ q_2_3
| q_3_3 ),
c_0_30,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ q_1_1
| ~ q_2_2
| p_1_2 ),
c_0_31,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ q_1_2
| q_1_1 ),
c_0_32,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ p_2_3
| ~ q_1_2 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ p_1_2
| ~ q_2_2
| q_1_2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ q_2_2
| ~ q_2_3
| p_2_3 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ~ q_1_2
| p_1_2 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_36]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ p_1_2
| ~ q_2_3
| q_1_3 ),
c_0_43,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ~ q_1_1
| ~ p_2_2
| q_1_2 ),
c_0_44,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ p_2_2
| ~ q_3_3
| q_2_3 ),
c_0_45,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ p_2_2
| ~ p_3_3
| p_2_3 ),
c_0_46,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ p_1_1
| ~ p_2_2
| p_1_2 ),
c_0_47,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ p_1_2
| ~ p_2_3 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ p_1_2
| p_2_2 ),
c_0_49,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN086-1.003 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:43:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % sh5l with pid 783095 completed with status 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/5.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/5.44 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 783102 completed with status 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/5.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/5.44 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/5.44
% 0.15/5.44 % No proof found!
% 0.15/5.44 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/5.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.44 % Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.15/5.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Initial clauses : 19
% 0.15/5.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.15/5.44 % Processed clauses : 24
% 0.15/5.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 24
% 0.15/5.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Generated clauses : 11
% 0.15/5.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.15/5.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.15/5.44 % Paramodulations : 11
% 0.15/5.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.15/5.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 22
% 0.15/5.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/5.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 43
% 0.15/5.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
% 0.15/5.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.15/5.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 554
% 0.15/5.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 41
% 0.15/5.44
% 0.15/5.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.44 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/5.44 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.15/5.44 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/5.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/5.44
% 0.15/5.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.44 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/5.44 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/5.44 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/5.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/5.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------