↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN088-1.010 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:32 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SYN088-1.010 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Jun 24 00:05:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.53/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.53/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.53/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.53/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  % File     : SYN088-1.010 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.53/0.60  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.53/0.60  % Problem  : Plaisted problem s(4,10)
% 0.53/0.60  % Version  : Biased.
% 0.53/0.60  % English  :
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Refs     : [Pla94] Plaisted (1994), The Search Efficiency of Theorem Prov
% 0.53/0.60  % Source   : [Pla94]
% 0.53/0.60  % Names    : S4n [Pla94]
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.60  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.53/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of literals    :   32 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Maximal clause size   :   11 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :   11 (  11 usr;   0 prp; 1-10 aty)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)
% 0.53/0.60  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_HRN
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Comments : Biased away from various calculi.
% 0.53/0.60  %          : tptp2X: -f tptp -s10 SYN088-1.g
% 0.53/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.53/0.60      ~ p(a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      ( p(X_1,X_2,X_3,X_4,X_5,X_6,X_7,X_8,X_9,X_10)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_1(X_1)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_2(X_2)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_3(X_3)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_4(X_4)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_5(X_5)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_6(X_6)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_7(X_7)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_8(X_8)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_9(X_9)
% 0.53/0.60      | ~ q_10(X_10) ) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_2,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_1(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_3,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_1(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_4,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_2(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_5,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_2(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_6,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_3(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_7,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_3(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_8,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_4(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_9,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_4(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_10,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_5(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_11,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_5(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_12,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_6(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_13,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_6(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_14,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_7(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_15,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_7(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_16,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_8(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_17,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_8(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_18,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_9(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_19,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_9(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_20,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_10(a) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  cnf(s4_21,axiom,
% 0.53/0.60      q_10(b) ).
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.53/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.60  %ClaNum:22(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.53/0.60  %VarNum:20(SingletonVarNum:10)
% 0.53/0.60  %MaxLitNum:11
% 0.53/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.53/0.60  %SharedTerms:23
% 0.53/0.60  %goalClause: 21
% 0.53/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.53/0.60  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.53/0.60  [2]P1(a2)
% 0.53/0.60  [3]P3(a1)
% 0.53/0.60  [4]P3(a2)
% 0.53/0.60  [5]P5(a1)
% 0.53/0.60  [6]P5(a2)
% 0.53/0.60  [7]P6(a1)
% 0.53/0.60  [8]P6(a2)
% 0.53/0.60  [9]P7(a1)
% 0.53/0.60  [10]P7(a2)
% 0.53/0.60  [11]P8(a1)
% 0.53/0.60  [12]P8(a2)
% 0.53/0.60  [13]P9(a1)
% 0.53/0.60  [14]P9(a2)
% 0.53/0.61  [15]P10(a1)
% 0.53/0.61  [16]P10(a2)
% 0.53/0.61  [17]P11(a1)
% 0.53/0.61  [18]P11(a2)
% 0.53/0.61  [19]P4(a1)
% 0.53/0.61  [20]P4(a2)
% 0.53/0.61  [21]~P2(a1,a1,a1,a1,a1,a1,a1,a1,a1,a1)
% 0.53/0.61  [22]~P1(x221)+~P3(x222)+~P5(x223)+~P6(x224)+~P7(x225)+~P8(x226)+~P9(x227)+~P10(x228)+~P11(x229)+~P4(x2210)+P2(x221,x222,x223,x224,x225,x226,x227,x228,x229,x2210)
% 0.53/0.61  %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.61  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.53/0.61     ($false),
% 0.53/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,22]),
% 0.53/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.53/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.53/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------