↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN091-1.003 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.10s 0.44s
% Output   : Saturation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_43ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_99ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_1_3,
    c_0_37,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ q_2_2
    | ~ p_3_3
    | q_2_3 ),
    c_0_38,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ p_2_3
    | p_3_3 ),
    c_0_39,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_3_3
    | sym_p_2_3 ),
    c_0_40,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_2_3
    | sym_q_2_2
    | sym_p_3_3 ),
    c_0_41,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_52,axiom,
    sym_p_1_3,
    sym_s2_goal_1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( ~ q_2_3
    | ~ q_1_2 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( ~ q_2_2
    | ~ p_2_3
    | q_2_3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( ~ q_1_2
    | q_2_2 ),
    c_0_47,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_2_2
    | sym_q_1_2 ),
    c_0_48,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_2_3
    | sym_q_2_2
    | sym_p_2_3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( sym_q_2_3
    | sym_q_1_2 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( ~ p_1_1
    | ~ q_2_2
    | q_1_2 ),
    c_0_53,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( ~ p_1_2
    | p_1_1 ),
    c_0_54,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( ~ q_2_2
    | ~ q_3_3
    | p_2_3 ),
    c_0_55,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( ~ q_2_3
    | q_3_3 ),
    c_0_56,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ( ~ q_1_1
    | ~ q_2_2
    | p_1_2 ),
    c_0_57,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    ( ~ q_1_2
    | q_1_1 ),
    c_0_58,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_3_3
    | sym_q_2_3 ),
    c_0_59,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_2_3
    | sym_q_2_2
    | sym_q_3_3 ),
    c_0_60,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_1_1
    | sym_q_1_2 ),
    c_0_61,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_1_2
    | sym_q_1_1
    | sym_q_2_2 ),
    c_0_62,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_83,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_1_1
    | sym_p_1_2 ),
    c_0_63,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_1_2
    | sym_p_1_1
    | sym_q_2_2 ),
    c_0_64,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    ( ~ p_2_3
    | ~ q_1_2 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]),c_0_69]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( sym_p_2_3
    | sym_q_1_2 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),c_0_72]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    ( ~ p_1_2
    | ~ q_2_2
    | q_1_2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    ( ~ q_2_2
    | ~ q_2_3
    | p_2_3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    ( ~ q_1_2
    | p_1_2 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]),c_0_69]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_2_3
    | sym_q_2_2
    | sym_q_2_3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_1_2
    | sym_q_1_2 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]),c_0_70]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_1_2
    | sym_p_1_2
    | sym_q_2_2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( ~ p_1_2
    | ~ q_2_3
    | q_1_3 ),
    c_0_85,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    ( ~ q_1_1
    | ~ p_2_2
    | q_1_2 ),
    c_0_86,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    ( ~ p_2_2
    | ~ q_3_3
    | q_2_3 ),
    c_0_87,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ( ~ p_2_2
    | ~ p_3_3
    | p_2_3 ),
    c_0_88,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( ~ p_1_1
    | ~ p_2_2
    | p_1_2 ),
    c_0_89,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    ( ~ p_1_2
    | ~ p_2_3 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_44]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_2_3
    | sym_p_2_2
    | sym_q_3_3 ),
    c_0_91,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_2_3
    | sym_p_2_2
    | sym_p_3_3 ),
    c_0_92,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_1_2
    | sym_q_1_1
    | sym_p_2_2 ),
    c_0_93,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_1_2
    | sym_p_1_1
    | sym_p_2_2 ),
    c_0_94,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( ~ sym_q_1_3
    | sym_p_1_2
    | sym_q_2_3 ),
    c_0_95,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    ( sym_p_1_2
    | sym_p_2_3 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_52])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    ( ~ sym_p_2_2
    | sym_p_1_2 ),
    c_0_97,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( ~ p_1_2
    | p_2_2 ),
    c_0_98,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN091-1.003 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:48:32 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 2923016 completed with status 1
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2923022 completed with status 1
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % No proof found!
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 38
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 38
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 38
% 0.10/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 49
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.10/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 48
% 0.10/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 22
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.10/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.10/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 22
% 0.10/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.10/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 46
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.10/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 44
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.10/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 262
% 0.10/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 257
% 0.10/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.10/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1023
% 0.10/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 72
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.45  % User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.10/0.45  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------