%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SYN095-1.002 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.25s
% Output : Proof 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN095-1.002 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.17 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.17 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.17 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.17 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.17 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:33:18 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.18 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.25 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.09/0.25
% 0.09/0.25 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.09/0.25
% 0.09/0.25 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.09/0.25 Axiom 1 (m_t2_3): p_2_2(a) = true.
% 0.09/0.25 Axiom 2 (m_t2_1): p_1_1(a) = true.
% 0.09/0.25 Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.09/0.25 Axiom 4 (m_s2_type11_1): ifeq(p_1_1(X), true, ifeq(p_2_2(X), true, p_1_2(X), true), true) = true.
% 0.09/0.25
% 0.09/0.25 Goal 1 (m_s2_goal_1): p_1_2(X) = true.
% 0.09/0.25 The goal is true when:
% 0.09/0.25 X = a
% 0.09/0.25
% 0.09/0.25 Proof:
% 0.09/0.25 p_1_2(a)
% 0.09/0.25 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.09/0.26 ifeq(true, true, p_1_2(a), true)
% 0.09/0.26 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.09/0.26 ifeq(true, true, ifeq(true, true, p_1_2(a), true), true)
% 0.09/0.26 = { by axiom 2 (m_t2_1) R->L }
% 0.09/0.26 ifeq(p_1_1(a), true, ifeq(true, true, p_1_2(a), true), true)
% 0.09/0.26 = { by axiom 1 (m_t2_3) R->L }
% 0.09/0.26 ifeq(p_1_1(a), true, ifeq(p_2_2(a), true, p_1_2(a), true), true)
% 0.09/0.26 = { by axiom 4 (m_s2_type11_1) }
% 0.09/0.26 true
% 0.09/0.26 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.09/0.26
% 0.09/0.26 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------