%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SYN099-1.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:32:10 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s % Output : Refutation 0.16s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27843/SYN/SYN099-1.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing .................................................. done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 36] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 14] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 296] [nf = 0] [nu = 44] [ut = 22] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 1316] [nf = 8] [nu = 288] [ut = 22] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: ~p_1_3_1(x0) % B3: p_2_2_1(a_0()) % B28: ~p_1_2_1(x0) | ~p_2_3_1(x0) | p_1_3_1(x0) % B30: ~p_2_2_1(x0) | ~p_3_3_1(x0) | p_2_3_1(x0) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > p_1_1_1(a_0()) % U3: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > p_2_2_1(a_0()) % U4: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > p_3_3_1(a_0()) % U16: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > p_2_3_1(a_0()) % U22: < d4 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > ~p_2_2_1(a_0()) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U2: % p_1_1_1(a_0()) ....... U2 % Derivation of unit clause U3: % p_2_2_1(a_0()) ....... U3 % Derivation of unit clause U4: % p_3_3_1(a_0()) ....... U4 % Derivation of unit clause U16: % p_2_2_1(a_0()) ....... B3 % ~p_2_2_1(x0) | ~p_3_3_1(x0) | p_2_3_1(x0) ....... B30 % ~p_3_3_1(a_0()) | p_2_3_1(a_0()) ....... R1 [B3:L0, B30:L0] % p_3_3_1(a_0()) ....... U4 % p_2_3_1(a_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U4:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U22: % ~p_1_3_1(x0) ....... B0 % ~p_1_2_1(x0) | ~p_2_3_1(x0) | p_1_3_1(x0) ....... B28 % ~p_1_2_1(x0) | ~p_2_3_1(x0) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B28:L2] % ~p_1_1_1(x0) | ~p_2_2_1(x0) | p_1_2_1(x0) ....... B26 % ~p_2_3_1(x0) | ~p_1_1_1(x0) | ~p_2_2_1(x0) ....... R2 [R1:L0, B26:L2] % p_2_3_1(a_0()) ....... U16 % ~p_1_1_1(a_0()) | ~p_2_2_1(a_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U16:L0] % p_1_1_1(a_0()) ....... U2 % ~p_2_2_1(a_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, U2:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % ~p_2_2_1(a_0()) ....... U22 % p_2_2_1(a_0()) ....... U3 % [] ....... R1 [U22:L0, U3:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 1330 % resolvents: 1322 factors: 8 % Number of unit clauses generated: 291 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 21.88 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 14 [2] = 8 [4] = 1 % Total = 23 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 291 [2] = 750 [3] = 289 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] p_1_1_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [1] p_1_2_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [2] p_1_3_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [3] p_2_2_1 (+)1 (-)1 % [4] p_2_3_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [5] p_3_3_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [6] q_1_1_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [7] q_1_2_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [8] q_1_3_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [9] q_2_2_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [10] q_2_3_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [11] q_3_3_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [12] sym_p_1_1_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [13] sym_p_1_2_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [14] sym_p_1_3_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [15] sym_p_2_2_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [16] sym_p_2_3_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [17] sym_p_3_3_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [18] sym_q_1_1_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [19] sym_q_1_2_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [20] sym_q_1_3_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [21] sym_q_2_2_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [22] sym_q_2_3_1 (+)0 (-)1 % [23] sym_q_3_3_1 (+)0 (-)1 % ------------------ % Total: (+)11 (-)12 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 23 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 5032 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 1336 % Number of unification failures: 0 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2894 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 8124 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 3 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 216 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 1 % Number of states in UCFA table: 26 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 23 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.13 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 59 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 1336 % ConstructUnitClause() = 225 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 0 secs % CPU time: 0.16 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------