%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN107-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_097,axiom,
( ~ s0(X1)
| q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_097) ).
cnf(rule_129,axiom,
( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
| k2(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_129) ).
cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
s0(d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_1) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ k2(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ s0(X1)
| q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_097]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
| k2(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_129]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ s0(X1)
| q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
s0(d),
axiom_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ k2(X1,d),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
| k2(X1,X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
q1(d,d,d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ k2(X1,d),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN107-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.57 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.57 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.57 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.57 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:44:25 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.58 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.66 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % new_bool_3 with pid 784528 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.66 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.66 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % SubtermCWHack with pid 784533 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.66 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.66 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.66
% 0.15/0.66 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.66 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.66 % Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.15/0.66 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 41
% 0.15/0.66 % Initial clauses : 328
% 0.15/0.66 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.15/0.66 % Initial clauses in saturation : 323
% 0.15/0.66 % Processed clauses : 183
% 0.15/0.66 % ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.15/0.66 % ...subsumed : 4
% 0.15/0.66 % ...remaining for further processing : 166
% 0.15/0.66 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.15/0.66 % Backward-rewritten : 54
% 0.15/0.66 % Generated clauses : 133
% 0.15/0.66 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 91
% 0.15/0.66 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Paramodulations : 133
% 0.15/0.66 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Total rewrite steps : 136
% 0.15/0.66 % ...of those cached : 55
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Current number of processed clauses : 104
% 0.15/0.66 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 75
% 0.15/0.66 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.66 % Non-unit-clauses : 28
% 0.15/0.66 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 220
% 0.15/0.66 % ...number of literals in the above : 735
% 0.15/0.66 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Current number of archived clauses : 62
% 0.15/0.66 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 614
% 0.15/0.66 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 495
% 0.15/0.66 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 0.15/0.66 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 94
% 0.15/0.66 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % BW rewrite match attempts : 63
% 0.15/0.66 % BW rewrite match successes : 48
% 0.15/0.66 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Termbank termtop insertions : 12274
% 0.15/0.66 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1516
% 0.15/0.66
% 0.15/0.66 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.66 % User time : 0.017 s
% 0.15/0.66 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Maximum resident set size: 4420 pages
% 0.15/0.66
% 0.15/0.66 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.66 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.15/0.66 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.15/0.66 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------