↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN110-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  25 unt;   0 nHn;  41 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   94 (   0 equ;  47 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (  33 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_024,axiom,
    ( ~ m1(X2,c,X2)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | ~ m0(a,X3,a)
    | m1(X1,a,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_024) ).

cnf(rule_014,axiom,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | m1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_014) ).

cnf(axiom_12,axiom,
    m0(a,X1,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_12) ).

cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
    m0(X1,d,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).

cnf(rule_029,axiom,
    ( ~ s0(X1)
    | ~ p0(X1,X2)
    | m1(X1,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_029) ).

cnf(rule_110,axiom,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_110) ).

cnf(rule_127,axiom,
    ( ~ k2(X4,X2)
    | ~ k1(X4)
    | ~ m1(X3,X2,X1)
    | k2(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_127) ).

cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
    p0(b,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).

cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
    s0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_5) ).

cnf(rule_129,axiom,
    ( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
    | k2(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_129) ).

cnf(axiom_33,axiom,
    q0(d,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_33) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k2(c,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(rule_001,axiom,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_001) ).

cnf(axiom_15,axiom,
    n0(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_15) ).

cnf(axiom_37,axiom,
    n0(b,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_37) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ m1(X2,c,X2)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | ~ m0(a,X3,a)
    | m1(X1,a,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_024]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | m1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_014]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ m1(X2,c,X2)
    | ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | ~ m0(a,X3,a)
    | m1(X1,a,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    m0(a,X1,a),
    axiom_12 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | m1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    m0(X1,d,X2),
    axiom_19 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ s0(X1)
    | ~ p0(X1,X2)
    | m1(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_029]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_110]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ q0(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1(X2,c,X2)
    | m1(X1,a,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    m1(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ k2(X4,X2)
    | ~ k1(X4)
    | ~ m1(X3,X2,X1)
    | k2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_127]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ s0(X1)
    | ~ p0(X1,X2)
    | m1(X1,X2,X1) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    p0(b,X1),
    axiom_14 ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    s0(b),
    axiom_5 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
    | k2(X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_129]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X2,X3,X1)
    | q1(X1,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ q0(X1,c)
    | m1(X1,a,c) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
    q0(d,c),
    axiom_33 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k2(c,a),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ k2(X4,X2)
    | ~ k1(X4)
    | ~ m1(X3,X2,X1)
    | k2(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    m1(b,X1,b),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ q1(X2,X1,X1)
    | k2(X1,X1) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    q1(X1,X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_001]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    m1(d,a,c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k2(c,a),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X2)
    | ~ k2(X2,X1)
    | k2(b,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    k2(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X2,X1)
    | k1(X1) ),
    c_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_44,axiom,
    n0(a,b),
    axiom_15 ).

cnf(c_0_45,axiom,
    n0(b,a),
    axiom_37 ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X1)
    | ~ k2(X1,a) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_39]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ k1(X1)
    | k2(b,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    k1(b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    k1(a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]),c_0_49])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SYN110-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.45  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:43:33 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.47/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % new_bool_3 with pid 3260184 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.47/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.47/0.63  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.47/0.63  % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.63  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3260192 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.47/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.47/0.63  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.47/0.63  % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.63  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  % Proof found!
% 0.47/0.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 369
% 0.47/0.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 41
% 0.47/0.63  % Initial clauses                      : 328
% 0.47/0.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.47/0.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 323
% 0.47/0.63  % Processed clauses                    : 1157
% 0.47/0.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 136
% 0.47/0.63  % ...subsumed                          : 145
% 0.47/0.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 876
% 0.47/0.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 93
% 0.47/0.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 226
% 0.47/0.63  % Generated clauses                    : 1544
% 0.47/0.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1169
% 0.47/0.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.47/0.63  % Paramodulations                      : 1544
% 0.47/0.63  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1126
% 0.47/0.63  % ...of those cached                   : 757
% 0.47/0.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.47/0.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.47/0.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.47/0.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.47/0.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.47/0.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.47/0.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.47/0.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.47/0.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.47/0.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.47/0.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.47/0.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.47/0.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 557
% 0.47/0.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 207
% 0.47/0.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.47/0.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.47/0.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 349
% 0.47/0.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 208
% 0.47/0.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 765
% 0.47/0.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 319
% 0.47/0.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26007
% 0.47/0.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21318
% 0.47/0.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 219
% 0.47/0.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1769
% 0.47/0.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 562
% 0.47/0.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 199
% 0.47/0.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.47/0.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 28196
% 0.47/0.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1514
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.63  % User time                : 0.060 s
% 0.47/0.63  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.47/0.63  % Total time               : 0.061 s
% 0.47/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4472 pages
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.63  % User time                : 0.066 s
% 0.47/0.63  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.47/0.63  % Total time               : 0.071 s
% 0.47/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.47/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------