%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYN110-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:47:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.94s 2.10s
% Output : Refutation 1.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ k2(c,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_37,axiom,
n0(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_37) ).
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(X8)
| ~ n0(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_001) ).
cnf(c4,plain,
k1(a),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_001,axiom_37]) ).
cnf(rule_129,axiom,
( k2(X126,X126)
| ~ q1(X127,X126,X126) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_129) ).
cnf(axiom_19,axiom,
m0(X4,d,X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).
cnf(rule_110,axiom,
( q1(X165,X165,X165)
| ~ m0(X164,X163,X165) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_110) ).
cnf(c205,plain,
q1(X166,X166,X166),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_110,axiom_19]) ).
cnf(c211,plain,
k2(X168,X168),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c205,rule_129]) ).
cnf(rule_127,axiom,
( k2(X523,X521)
| ~ m1(X524,X521,X523)
| ~ k1(X522)
| ~ k2(X522,X521) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_127) ).
cnf(axiom_33,axiom,
q0(d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_33) ).
cnf(rule_006,axiom,
( m1(X35,X35,X35)
| ~ m0(X36,X36,X35) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_006) ).
cnf(c44,plain,
m1(X37,X37,X37),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_006,axiom_19]) ).
cnf(rule_024,axiom,
( m1(X100,a,X99)
| ~ m0(a,X101,a)
| ~ q0(X100,X99)
| ~ m1(X99,c,X99) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_024) ).
cnf(c126,plain,
( m1(X1142,a,c)
| ~ m0(a,X1143,a)
| ~ q0(X1142,c) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[rule_024,c44]) ).
cnf(c1392,plain,
( m1(X1145,a,c)
| ~ q0(X1145,c) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c126,axiom_19]) ).
cnf(c1394,plain,
m1(d,a,c),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1392,axiom_33]) ).
cnf(c1397,plain,
( k2(c,a)
| ~ k1(X1615)
| ~ k2(X1615,a) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1394,rule_127]) ).
cnf(c2080,plain,
( k2(c,a)
| ~ k1(a) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1397,c211]) ).
cnf(c2083,plain,
k2(c,a),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2080,c4]) ).
cnf(c2084,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2083,prove_this]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN110-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed May 8 19:49:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.94/2.10 % Version: 1.5
% 1.94/2.10 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.94/2.10 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.94/2.10
% 1.94/2.10 % Initial clauses : 369
% 1.94/2.10 % Processed clauses : 1168
% 1.94/2.10 % Factors computed : 10
% 1.94/2.10 % Resolvents computed: 2081
% 1.94/2.10 % Tautologies deleted: 16
% 1.94/2.10 % Forward subsumed : 1000
% 1.94/2.10 % Backward subsumed : 533
% 1.94/2.10 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 1.94/2.10 % User time : 1.742 s
% 1.94/2.10 % System time : 0.017 s
% 1.94/2.10 % Total time : 1.759 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------