↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN110-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.02s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   88 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  100 (  51   ~;  49   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   0 sgn  44   !;   0   ?;  27   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : m0(a,X0,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_12) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0] : p0(b,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    l0(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_24) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    q0(d,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_33) ).

fof(f37,axiom,
    n0(b,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_37) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ n0(X1,X0)
      | k1(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_001) ).

fof(f58,axiom,
    ( ~ l0(c)
    | m1(c,c,c) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_020) ).

fof(f62,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ m1(X1,c,X1)
      | ~ q0(X0,X1)
      | ~ m0(a,X2,a)
      | m1(X0,a,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_024) ).

fof(f130,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p0(X3,X0)
      | ~ n0(X2,X1)
      | q1(X0,X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_092) ).

fof(f165,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ k2(X3,X1)
      | ~ k1(X3)
      | ~ m1(X2,X1,X0)
      | k2(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_127) ).

fof(f167,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ q1(X1,X0,X0)
      | k2(X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_129) ).

fof(f369,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k2(c,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

tcf(c_418,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k2(c,a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f369]) ).

tcf(c_429,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( m1(X2,a,X0)
      | ~ q0(X2,X0)
      | ~ m0(a,X1,a)
      | ~ m1(X0,c,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

tcf(c_434,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : m0(a,X0,a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_460,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( k2(X1,X1)
      | ~ q1(X0,X1,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

tcf(c_462,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( k2(X2,X1)
      | ~ k1(X3)
      | ~ k2(X3,X1)
      | ~ m1(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f165]) ).

tcf(c_537,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( q1(X3,X1,X3)
      | ~ p0(X2,X3)
      | ~ n0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f130]) ).

tcf(c_545,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : p0(b,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_556,plain,
    q0(d,c),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tcf(c_621,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( k1(X1)
      | ~ n0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_622,plain,
    n0(b,a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

tcf(c_690,plain,
    ( m1(c,c,c)
    | ~ l0(c) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

tcf(c_693,plain,
    l0(c),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_1072,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_38
      | ~ m0(a,X0,a) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_38])],[c_429]) ).

tcf(c_1073,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_39
      | ~ q0(X0,X1)
      | ~ m1(X1,c,X1)
      | m1(X0,a,X1) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_39])],[c_429]) ).

tcf(c_1074,plain,
    ( iPr_def_39
    | iPr_def_38 ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_429]) ).

tcf(c_1107,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( m1(X0,a,c)
      | ~ iPr_def_39
      | ~ q0(X0,c)
      | ~ m1(c,c,c) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1073]) ).

tcf(c_1124,plain,
    ( k1(a)
    | ~ n0(b,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_621]) ).

tcf(c_1237,plain,
    ( m1(d,a,c)
    | ~ iPr_def_39
    | ~ q0(d,c)
    | ~ m1(c,c,c) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1107]) ).

tcf(c_1239,plain,
    p0(b,a),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_545]) ).

tcf(c_1243,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( k2(c,a)
      | ~ k1(X1)
      | ~ k2(X1,a)
      | ~ m1(X0,a,c) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_462]) ).

tcf(c_1294,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( k2(c,a)
      | ~ k1(a)
      | ~ k2(a,a)
      | ~ m1(X0,a,c) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1243]) ).

tcf(c_1295,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( k2(a,a)
      | ~ q1(X0,a,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_460]) ).

tcf(c_1317,plain,
    ( k2(a,a)
    | ~ q1(a,a,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1295]) ).

tcf(c_1318,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( q1(a,a,a)
      | ~ p0(X1,a)
      | ~ n0(X0,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_537]) ).

tcf(c_1319,plain,
    ( q1(a,a,a)
    | ~ p0(b,a)
    | ~ n0(b,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1318]) ).

tcf(c_1348,plain,
    ( k2(c,a)
    | ~ k1(a)
    | ~ k2(a,a)
    | ~ m1(d,a,c) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1294]) ).

tcf(c_1349,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1348,c_1319,c_1317,c_1239,c_1237,c_1124,c_1072,c_1074,c_690,c_434,c_418,c_556,c_622,c_693]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN110-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:16:58 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running EPR theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s epr_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.41  % Proving...
% 3.02/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.02/1.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.02/1.19  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.02/1.19  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 3.02/1.19  % 
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 177 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e % 
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 3.02/1.19   gs_s  sp: 40 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Proving...
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % 
% 3.02/1.19  % clauses                               172
% 3.02/1.19  % conjectures                           1
% 3.02/1.19  % EPR                                   172
% 3.02/1.19  % Horn                                  152
% 3.02/1.19  % unary                                 50
% 3.02/1.19  % binary                                62
% 3.02/1.19  % lits                                  376
% 3.02/1.19  % lits eq                               0
% 3.02/1.19  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.02/1.19  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.02/1.19  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.02/1.19  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.02/1.19  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ 
% 3.02/1.19  % Current options:
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ 
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % 
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % ------ Proving...
% 3.02/1.19  % 
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.02/1.19  
% 3.02/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------