↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN111-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GPXoJKXsUt true

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:04:02 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.90s 1.10s
% Output   : Refutation 2.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN111-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GPXoJKXsUt true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:34:23 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.68  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.68  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.68  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.88  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/1.06  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 2.90/1.10  % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 2.90/1.10  % done 526 iterations in 0.257s
% 2.90/1.10  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 2.90/1.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.90/1.10  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(k0_type, type, k0: $i > $o).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(m0_type, type, m0: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $o).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(q1_type, type, q1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(l0_type, type, l0: $i > $o).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(m1_type, type, m1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(k2_type, type, k2: $i > $i > $o).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(axiom_19, axiom, (m0 @ X @ d @ Y)).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (m0 @ X0 @ d @ X1)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_19])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(rule_110, axiom, (( q1 @ B @ B @ B ) | ( ~( m0 @ C @ D @ B ) ))).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl147, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.90/1.10         ( (q1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (m0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_110])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl437, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (q1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl147])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(rule_129, axiom, (( k2 @ J @ J ) | ( ~( q1 @ A @ J @ J ) ))).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl166, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k2 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (q1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_129])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl515, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (k2 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl437, zip_derived_cl166])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(axiom_31, axiom, (m0 @ b @ b @ e)).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain, ( (m0 @ b @ b @ e)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_31])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(rule_005, axiom, (( m1 @ B @ C @ B ) | ( ~( m0 @ C @ C @ B ) ))).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl42, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (m0 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_005])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(rule_127, axiom,
% 2.90/1.10    (( k2 @ C @ D ) | ( ~( m1 @ E @ D @ C ) ) | ( ~( k1 @ F ) ) | 
% 2.90/1.10     ( ~( k2 @ F @ D ) ))).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl164, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 2.90/1.10         ( (k2 @ X0 @ X1)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (m1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (k1 @ X3)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (k2 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_127])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl906, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.90/1.10         (~ (m0 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (k2 @ X2 @ X1)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (k1 @ X2)
% 2.90/1.10          |  (k2 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl42, zip_derived_cl164])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl954, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i]: ( (k2 @ e @ b) | ~ (k1 @ X0) | ~ (k2 @ X0 @ b))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl906])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl970, plain, ((~ (k1 @ b) |  (k2 @ e @ b))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl515, zip_derived_cl954])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(axiom_7, axiom, (n0 @ d @ b)).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ b)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_7])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(rule_001, axiom, (( k1 @ I ) | ( ~( n0 @ J @ I ) ))).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl326, plain, ( (k1 @ b)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl973, plain, ( (k2 @ e @ b)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl970, zip_derived_cl326])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(rule_021, axiom,
% 2.90/1.10    (( m1 @ I @ J @ I ) | ( ~( l0 @ I ) ) | ( ~( k0 @ J ) ))).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl58, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (l0 @ X0) | ~ (k0 @ X1))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_021])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl164, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 2.90/1.10         ( (k2 @ X0 @ X1)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (m1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (k1 @ X3)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (k2 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_127])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl816, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.90/1.10         (~ (k0 @ X1)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (l0 @ X0)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (k2 @ X2 @ X1)
% 2.90/1.10          | ~ (k1 @ X2)
% 2.90/1.10          |  (k2 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl58, zip_derived_cl164])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl988, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i]: ( (k2 @ X0 @ b) | ~ (k1 @ e) | ~ (l0 @ X0) | ~ (k0 @ b))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl973, zip_derived_cl816])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(axiom_3, axiom, (n0 @ d @ e)).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ e)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_3])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 2.90/1.10      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl324, plain, ( (k1 @ e)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(axiom_32, axiom, (k0 @ b)).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain, ( (k0 @ b)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_32])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl990, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (k2 @ X0 @ b) | ~ (l0 @ X0))),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.90/1.10                [zip_derived_cl988, zip_derived_cl324, zip_derived_cl31])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(prove_this, conjecture, (k2 @ c @ b)).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( k2 @ c @ b )),
% 2.90/1.10    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl321, plain, (~ (k2 @ c @ b)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl1004, plain, (~ (l0 @ c)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl990, zip_derived_cl321])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(axiom_24, axiom, (l0 @ c)).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain, ( (l0 @ c)),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_24])).
% 2.90/1.10  thf(zip_derived_cl1007, plain, ($false),
% 2.90/1.10      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1004, zip_derived_cl23])).
% 2.90/1.10  
% 2.90/1.10  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.90/1.10  
% 2.90/1.10  
% 2.90/1.10  % Terminating...
% 3.49/1.23  % Runner terminated.
% 3.49/1.24  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------