%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SYN127-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 08:59:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
r0(e) ).
cnf(axiom_28,axiom,
k0(e) ).
cnf(rule_090,axiom,
( p1(e,e,e)
| ~ r0(e)
| ~ k0(e) ) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( n2(A)
| ~ p1(B,C,A) ) ).
cnf(rule_244,axiom,
( p3(H,H,H)
| ~ n2(H) ) ).
cnf(rule_277,axiom,
( l4(J)
| ~ p3(A,B,J) ) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ l4(e) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
( ~ n2(e)
| p3(e,e,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_244:[bind(H,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ r0(e)
| p1(e,e,e) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( k0(e) )],[axiom_28,rule_090]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
p1(e,e,e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( r0(e) )],[axiom_13,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( ~ p1(e,e,e)
| n2(e) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_137:[bind(A,$fot(e)),bind(B,$fot(e)),bind(C,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
n2(e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p1(e,e,e) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
p3(e,e,e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( n2(e) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
( ~ p3(e,e,e)
| l4(e) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_277:[bind(A,$fot(e)),bind(B,$fot(e)),bind(J,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
l4(e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( p3(e,e,e) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_6]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( l4(e) )],[refute_0_7,prove_this]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN127-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:05:15 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.21/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.48
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------