↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN127-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.75s 1.21s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  40   ~;  38   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn  27   !;   0   ?;  17   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    s0(d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_1) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    r0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_13) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0] : q0(X0,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_17) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    k0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_28) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    k0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_32) ).

fof(f106,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ k0(X0)
      | p1(X0,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_068) ).

fof(f155,axiom,
    ( ~ s0(d)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | q1(d,d,d) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_117) ).

fof(f162,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ q1(d,X1,d)
      | ~ s0(d)
      | ~ q0(X0,X1)
      | r1(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_124) ).

fof(f178,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p1(b,X0,X1)
      | ~ r0(e)
      | ~ r1(b)
      | n2(e) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_140) ).

fof(f282,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ n2(X0)
      | p3(X0,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_244) ).

fof(f315,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p3(X1,X2,X0)
      | l4(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_277) ).

fof(f369,negated_conjecture,
    ~ l4(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

tcf(c_418,negated_conjecture,
    ~ l4(e),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f369]) ).

tcf(c_435,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( l4(X2)
      | ~ p3(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f315]) ).

tcf(c_510,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( n2(e)
      | ~ r1(b)
      | ~ r0(e)
      | ~ p1(b,X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f178]) ).

tcf(c_511,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( r1(X1)
      | ~ s0(d)
      | ~ q0(X1,X0)
      | ~ q1(d,X0,d) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).

tcf(c_558,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p3(X0,X0,X0)
      | ~ n2(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f282]) ).

tcf(c_579,plain,
    r0(e),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_601,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : q0(X0,d),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_605,plain,
    ( q1(d,d,d)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | ~ s0(d) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f155]) ).

tcf(c_614,plain,
    s0(d),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_689,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p1(X0,X0,X0)
      | ~ k0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

tcf(c_691,plain,
    k0(b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_692,plain,
    k0(e),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_764,plain,
    q0(b,d),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_601]) ).

tcf(c_778,plain,
    ( p1(b,b,b)
    | ~ k0(b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_689]) ).

tcf(c_882,plain,
    ( n2(e)
    | ~ r1(b)
    | ~ r0(e)
    | ~ p1(b,b,b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_510]) ).

tcf(c_1012,plain,
    ( n2(e)
    | ~ r1(b) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_510,c_691,c_579,c_778,c_882]) ).

tcf(c_1024,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( r1(X1)
      | ~ q1(d,X0,d)
      | ~ q0(X1,X0) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_511,c_614,c_511]) ).

tcf(c_1025,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( r1(X1)
      | ~ q0(X1,X0)
      | ~ q1(d,X0,d) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_1024]) ).

tcf(c_1234,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( l4(e)
      | ~ p3(X0,X1,e) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_435]) ).

tcf(c_1313,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( r1(X0)
      | ~ q0(X0,d)
      | ~ q1(d,d,d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1025]) ).

tcf(c_1314,plain,
    ( r1(b)
    | ~ q0(b,d)
    | ~ q1(d,d,d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1313]) ).

tcf(c_1647,plain,
    ( l4(e)
    | ~ p3(e,e,e) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1234]) ).

tcf(c_1649,plain,
    ( p3(e,e,e)
    | ~ n2(e) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_558]) ).

tcf(c_1650,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1649,c_1647,c_1314,c_1012,c_605,c_764,c_418,c_614,c_692]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN127-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:15:44 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running EPR theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s epr_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.44  % Proving...
% 2.75/1.21  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.21  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.75/1.21  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.75/1.21  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.75/1.21  % 
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 69 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e % 
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.75/1.21   gs_s  sp: 88 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Proving...
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % 
% 2.75/1.21  % clauses                               334
% 2.75/1.21  % conjectures                           1
% 2.75/1.21  % EPR                                   334
% 2.75/1.21  % Horn                                  291
% 2.75/1.21  % unary                                 51
% 2.75/1.21  % binary                                138
% 2.75/1.21  % lits                                  814
% 2.75/1.21  % lits eq                               0
% 2.75/1.21  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.75/1.21  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.75/1.21  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.75/1.21  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.75/1.21  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ 
% 2.75/1.21  % Current options:
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ 
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % 
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % ------ Proving...
% 2.75/1.21  % 
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.21  
% 2.75/1.21  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.75/1.22  
% 2.75/1.22  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------